<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>overclocking - OCFreaks!</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/tag/overclocking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/tag/overclocking/</link>
	<description>Overclocking , Gaming , Technology , Robotics &#38; DIY!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2017 16:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.4</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">42777727</site>	<item>
		<title>Asus X99 Motherboards to feature OC Socket</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-x99-motherboards-feature-oc-socket/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-x99-motherboards-feature-oc-socket/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umang Gajera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=2502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Asus introduces OC Socket for their X99 lineup of motherboards including ROG motherboards. OC Socket will push the overclocking potential of these motherboards even further - be it the CPU or RAM.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-x99-motherboards-feature-oc-socket/">Asus X99 Motherboards to feature OC Socket</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" width="540px" class="aligncenter" src="http://rog.asus.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/R5E_211-980x660.jpg" /></p>
<p>With the launch of X99 Motherboard lineup, Asus has also introduced something new i.e. the OC Socket. This patent-pending(as of now) OC Socket will feature some extra pins compared to the reference LGA2011-v3 grid patten. As per Asus it offers some good Overclocking benefits and Compatibility wise, its compatible with the newer generation Intel LGA2011-v3 socket based CPUs. The following X99 motherboards from Asus will feature the OC Socket :</p>
<ul>
<li>ROG Rampage V Extreme</li>
<li>ASUS X99-Deluxe</li>
<li>ASUS X99-Pro</li>
<li>ASUS X99-A</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p><strong>What is OC Socket?</strong></p>
<p>Haswell-E (Intel Core i7-5960X, 5930X and 5280K) processors actually have more pads than the reference LGA2011-3 socket design, so ASUS added extra socket pins to tap this resource. OC Socket is an enhancement based on the reference LGA2011-3 design, so for users not overclocking or tweaking voltages in the BIOS, OC Socket does not activate. However for those that do overclock and tune performance, there’s significant benefits.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here are some comparisons between Reference Socket, OC Socket and the Haswell :</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="http://rog.asus.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ASUS-OC-Socket-comparison-980x480.jpg" /></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="http://rog.asus.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/ASUS-OC-socket-CPU-fits-980x522.jpg" /></p>
<p>As per Asus other benefits of the OC Socket as follows &#8211;</p>
<p>Very Tiny Voltage drop :</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="http://rog.asus.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/oc-socket-no-vdrop.jpg" /></p>
<p>Per Core Finetuning :</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="http://rog.asus.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/oc-socket-processor-core-tuning-980x363.jpg" /></p>
<p>Even more DD4 performance :</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="http://rog.asus.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/DDR4-OC-performance1-980x632.jpg" /></p>
<p>Source : <a href="http://rog.asus.com/347222014/rampage-motherboards/asus-rog-x99-exclusive-oc-socket-extra-pins-extra-performance/">Asus</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-x99-motherboards-feature-oc-socket/">Asus X99 Motherboards to feature OC Socket</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-x99-motherboards-feature-oc-socket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2502</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Maximus VI Formula Z87 motherboard review : the gaming board with an overclocking gene.</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-maximus-vi-formula-z87-motherboard-review-the-gaming-board-with-an-overclocking-gene/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-maximus-vi-formula-z87-motherboard-review-the-gaming-board-with-an-overclocking-gene/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=1817</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We get our hands on the crème de la crème Gaming board from Asus,read more to know how it is..</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-maximus-vi-formula-z87-motherboard-review-the-gaming-board-with-an-overclocking-gene/">Asus Maximus VI Formula Z87 motherboard review : the gaming board with an overclocking gene.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction--><br />
<span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Introduction</span></span></p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/maximus-vi-formula/MVIF_28.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/maximus-vi-formula/s/MVIF_28.jpg" width="600" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>Intel likes to update their processor architectures every couple of years. This however comes in two forms, which Intel likes to call ‘<em>Tick-Tock</em>’. <strong><em>Tick</em></strong> basically gives the present architecture a die shrink, adds a couple more features and optionally new instruction sets, while the more evolutionary <em><strong>Tock</strong></em> represents a new micro architecture.</p>
<p>Let’s look back at the last couple of years before we delve into today’s review.<br />
With Sandy Bridge, Intel introduced a major architectural change, probably their best barring Conroe, and shook the market quite a bit. Ivy Bridge, the die shrink to Sandy Bridge, didn’t meet with as much enthusiasm as its predecessor due to the heat issues and a new chipset almost forced upon consumers besides providing near identical performance as comparable Sandy Bridge parts. All this time, Intel really did not have any true competition on hand. With AMD focusing on mobile parts and APU solutions and receding themselves into value oriented markets, they probably didn’t need to. Enter Haswell &#8211; Intel’s newest Tock, featuring a 22nm process, and a plethora of other options including the voltage regulators now being on die and not on motherboard itself. With it, Intel has also introduced a chipset in the form of Z87 (as is obvious).<br />
With Haswell though, Intel’s focus is clear – providing the same/better performance with much better thermals and power consumption. It might not look important for the average Joe, but when you consider mobile space, and Ultrabooks or tablet hybrids like the Surface Pro, the advantage becomes really apparent.<br />
Z87 as a chipset is going through same iterations from motherboard manufacturers – most of them have today a consumer range, a gaming range, and an enthusiast range.<br />
Asus is no different. With Republic of Gamers, Asus already has probably the best branding in their hands, and it is divided into the following categories –</p>
<ol>
<li>Impact – Mini ITX ROG board introduced in Z87, best for SFF gaming systems.</li>
<li>Gene – Micro ATX suited for best bang for the buck systems.</li>
<li>Hero – Entry level ATX board introduced in Z87.</li>
<li>Formula – Prosumer gaming board with best on board audio.</li>
<li>Extreme – Geared mostly for LN2 overclockers and enthusiasts.</li>
</ol>
<p>These boards range from $195 to $380 depending upon your choice/preferences.</p>
<p>We are looking today at the Maximus VI Formula, priced at a hefty $300. Asus puts the Formula as their crème de la crème Gaming board, and equips the board with a set of overclocking and gaming features which they say are significantly better than others. The main one among them is what they call SupremeFX Audio. ROG shield also debuts with the Formula, with a plastic/metal sheath covering the board also seen in their Sabertooth series. So is this the best gaming board that you have been looking for? Let’s take a look.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-maximus-vi-formula-z87-motherboard-review-the-gaming-board-with-an-overclocking-gene/">Asus Maximus VI Formula Z87 motherboard review : the gaming board with an overclocking gene.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-maximus-vi-formula-z87-motherboard-review-the-gaming-board-with-an-overclocking-gene/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1817</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>OCFreaks presents SuperPi 8M competetion</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/ocfreaks-presents-superpi-8m-competetion/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/ocfreaks-presents-superpi-8m-competetion/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=1580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey all&#8230; OCFreaks Team is happy to announce that we have one more contest for all the overclockers out there. So if you are sporting an Sandy bridge or Ivy bridge rig or rocking with a Piledriver or Bulldozer based PC then come and compete for the prizes that are up for grabs. Rules Only [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/ocfreaks-presents-superpi-8m-competetion/">OCFreaks presents SuperPi 8M competetion</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey all&#8230;<br />
OCFreaks Team is happy to announce that we have one more contest for all the overclockers out there.</p>
<p>So if you are sporting an Sandy bridge or Ivy bridge rig or rocking with a Piledriver or Bulldozer based PC then come and compete for the prizes that are up for grabs.</p>
<p>Rules</p>
<ul>
<li>Only Sandy/ivybridge or Sandy Bridge-E /Ivy Bridge-E or Piledriver/Bulldozer based processors.</li>
<li>Super Pi 8M benchmark</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/official.jpg" width="600" height="400" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For a more detailed set of rules click <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/forums/f5/ocfreaks-superpi-8m-comepetetion-3079/" target="_blank">here</a> .</p>
<p>Hoping to see you there !<br />
&#8211;</p>
<p>Sumon</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/ocfreaks-presents-superpi-8m-competetion/">OCFreaks presents SuperPi 8M competetion</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/ocfreaks-presents-superpi-8m-competetion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1580</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Maximus V formula review</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-maximus-v-formula-z77-review/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-maximus-v-formula-z77-review/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A close look at the new Benchmarker's Dream Motherboard from ASUS. The ASUS Maximus V Formula Motherboard Reviewed!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-maximus-v-formula-z77-review/">Asus Maximus V formula review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction--><br />
<span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Introduction</span></span></p>
<p>Well&#8230;i was kinda riding high with my last review and was kinda sad that the <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-p8z77-v-deluxe-review/">P8Z77 V Deluxe</a> had to go. But the guys over at Asus had some other plans! So one fine day&#8230;I found this at my doorstep!</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/maximus-v-formula-z77-review/unboxing/DSCF6411.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>My latest toy..the Maximus V Formula!</p>
<p>Now..before we dive into the product showcase and review lets have a look into the history of ROG line of Hardware and this board in particular Rog was established way back in 2006 with the <a href="http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/AMD_AM2/CROSSHAIR/">Crosshair</a>(yes its an AMD board and back in the FX-64 days AMD literally thrashed Intel until the 45nm C2D and C2Q came out),soon they launched another Board <a href="http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_775 Commando/">Commando</a> and soon other boards followed.</p>
<div class="highlight">
<p>Here&#8217;s a short history for the guys who are interested:</p>
<ul>
<li>JUL 2006 &#8211; ROG brand established, 1st gaming motherboard named Crosshair launched</li>
<li>DEC 2006- Launched Commando, broke CPU overclocking world record</li>
<li>JUL 2007 &#8211; ROG motherboard breakthroughs &#8211; Fusion Block system and CrossLinx</li>
<li>DEC 2007 &#8211; New ROG product line &#8211; gaming notebooks G1/G2</li>
<li>OCT 2009 &#8211; ROG Maximus III Formula motherboard with ROG Connect allows PC tuning on a pure hardware level in real time.</li>
<li>JUL 2008 &#8211; New ROG product line &#8211; Matrix graphics cards launched</li>
<li>OCT 2009 &#8211; The first 3D gaming notebook in the world, ROG G53J 3D</li>
<li>MAR 2010 &#8211; Rampage III Extreme motherboard attracts attention with great performance and overclockability</li>
<li>JUN 2010 &#8211; The world&#8217;s fastest graphics card launches &#8212; the dual 5870 GPU ARES</li>
<li>JUN 2010 &#8211; The world&#8217;s first active-noise cancelling pro gaming headset – Vulcan ANC</li>
<li>OCT 2011 &#8211; Launched TYTAN CG8565 desktop</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>In short ROG offers the best from the stable of Asus and will have everything you need in a motherboard from gaming specific features to overclocking.<br />
Now,enough of history lessons.. Lets have a look at the board and what it offers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-maximus-v-formula-z77-review/">Asus Maximus V formula review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-maximus-v-formula-z77-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">357</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GSKILL RipjawsX 4GB DDR3 1600Mhz CL9 Review</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-cl9-review/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-cl9-review/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umang Gajera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello again folks , today we are gonna review Gskill&#8217;s RipJawsX 1600Mhz CL9 DDR3 4GBx1 RAM. From quite some time now Gskill has proved itself as one of the best Brands when it comes to Overclocking , Performance and Price. This RAM best fits the low to mid-end systems and is one of the best [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-cl9-review/">GSKILL RipjawsX 4GB DDR3 1600Mhz CL9 Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again folks , today we are gonna review Gskill&#8217;s RipJawsX 1600Mhz CL9 DDR3 4GBx1 RAM. From quite some time now Gskill has proved itself as one of the best Brands when it comes to Overclocking , Performance and Price. This RAM best fits the low to mid-end systems and is one of the best choice if you are planning for a budget Gaming RIG. You can literally overclock this RAM to its limits given you know what you are doing! Now lets have a look at the RAM itself :</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/1.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/1.jpg" ></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/2.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/2.jpg" ></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/3.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/3.jpg" ></a></p>
<p>This RAM doesn&#8217;t have flashy heat spreader but is indeed a decent looking one.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/4.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/4.jpg" ></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/5.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/5.jpg" ></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/6.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/6.jpg" ></a></p>
<h4>Overclocking &#038; Results</h4>
<p>The Rig that we used for Benching was :</p>
<p><center></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>CPU</td>
<td>AthlonII X2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RAM</td>
<td>Gskill RipjawsX DDR3 4GB 1600Mhz CL9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Motherboard</td>
<td>Gigabyte 880GM-USB3L</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PSU</td>
<td>Cosair CX430W</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<p>The stock or defaults values for the RAM are as follows :</p>
<p><center></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Frequency</td>
<td>1600Mhz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Memory Size</td>
<td>4GBx1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timings</td>
<td>9-9-9-24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Voltage</td>
<td>1.5 Volts</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<p>Following are the different overclock Settings / Profiles used for Benchmarking:<br />
<center></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Component</td>
<td>Stock Settings</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue"><strong>OC1 Settings</strong></td>
<td class="ocf_darkred"><strong>OC2 Settings</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AMD AthlonII X2</td>
<td>3.2Ghz @ 1.4V</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">4.08Ghz @ 1.52V </td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">4.18Ghz @ 1.52V</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GSkill Ripjaws DDR3</td>
<td>1600Mhz CL9</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">1700Mhz CL11 @1.5v</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">1920Mhz CL11 @1.6v</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>880GM Northbridge</td>
<td>2000Mhz</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">2340Mhz</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">2600Mhz</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<h4>Graphs for Benchmarking Results</h4>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/mm.jpg" /></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/a.jpg" /></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/ss.jpg" /></p>
<h4>Results in Details</h4>
<p><center></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Benchmark</td>
<td>Stock</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue"><strong>OC1</strong></td>
<td class="ocf_darkred"><strong>OC2</strong></td>
<td>Units</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MaxxMEM &#8211; Mem-Copy</td>
<td>8230</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9019</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9934</td>
<td>MB/s</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MaxxMEM &#8211; Mem-Read</td>
<td>8030</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9839</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">10546</td>
<td>MB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MaxxMEM &#8211; Mem-Write</td>
<td>5768</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">8804</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9080</td>
<td>MB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MaxxMEM &#8211; Mem-Latency</td>
<td>57.4</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">52.4</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">49.0</td>
<td>ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AIDA64 Mem-Read</td>
<td>7950</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9758</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">10601</td>
<td>MB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AIDA64 Mem-Write</td>
<td>5783</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9183</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9433</td>
<td>MB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AIDA64 Mem-Copy</td>
<td>7643</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">8709</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9782</td>
<td>ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AIDA64 Mem-Latency</td>
<td>51.2</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">45.4</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">43.3</td>
<td>ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sandra Mem-performance</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9.9</td>
<td>GB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sandra Interger iSSE2 Mem-BW</td>
<td>7.28</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9.88</td>
<td>GB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sandra Float iSSE2 Mem-BW</td>
<td>7.31</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">10</td>
<td>GB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SuperPI 1M (mod1.5 XS)</td>
<td>24.539</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">19.828</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">19.063</td>
<td>Secs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>wPrime 32M</td>
<td>49.03</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">38.421</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">37.361</td>
<td>Secs</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<h4>Conclusion</h4>
<p>As seen from the results Overclocking this RAM is very easy. In my case I reached 1920-1940 Mhz @ 11-11-11-28-38 @2T on 1.6 Volts. From this its quite obvious that the RAM can go past 2000Mhz with more relaxed timings i.e at CL12 and on 1.7Volts if required. I tried loosen the timings as much as I could and set memory Voltage to 1.7Volts on Gigabyte 880GM-USB3L; but the motherboard won&#8217;t accept it and would reset the CPU clock and RAM multiplier to default. This doesn&#8217;t mean that the RAM is not capable of reaching 2000Mhz+ since I am pretty sure that the motherboard was limiting the MAX Overclock and not the RAM. On a side not : Specs for Gigabyte 880GM-USB3L says it supports &#8220;1666+ Mhz&#8221; Ram so it was pretty good getting 1920-1940Mhz stable on this motherboard.</p>
<p>I would recommend this RAM for low to mid-end PC builds while there are better alternatives from Gskill and Corsair for Beefy RIG Builds. The price to performance of this RAM is rock solid! </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-cl9-review/">GSKILL RipjawsX 4GB DDR3 1600Mhz CL9 Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-cl9-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">265</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gigabyte 880GM-USB3L Review</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gigabyte-880gm-usb3l-review-and-overclocking/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gigabyte-880gm-usb3l-review-and-overclocking/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umang Gajera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=227</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today we have reviewed Gigabyte's 880GM-USB3L featuring USB3 support and AM3+ Socket. Lets see why it can be your choice for budget Gaming RIG!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/gigabyte-880gm-usb3l-review-and-overclocking/">Gigabyte 880GM-USB3L Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction - 880GM-USB3L--></p>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Introduction</span></span></p>
<p>The motherboard which we are going to review today is Gigabyte 880GM USB3L. This motherboard falls in low to mid-end range and provides good set of features for the price. It was around $90-$100 at the time of this review. Like many motherboards out there in the market this one too has a smaller and a bigger brother. 880GM-D2H is a little bit cheaper than this and lacks USB3 support , except for USB3 both the motherboards are almost Identical. 880-GM USB3 being its bigger brother has some extra features and is priced higher as compared to the one being reviewed. When it comes to overclocking this board doesn&#8217;t fall behind and is indeed a serious Overclockable motherboard.</p>
<p>First , lets have a look at the box:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/880gm-usb3l/s/1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/880gm-usb3l/s/2.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/gigabyte-880gm-usb3l-review-and-overclocking/">Gigabyte 880GM-USB3L Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gigabyte-880gm-usb3l-review-and-overclocking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">227</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overclocking Guide for Intel LGA1156 Platform CPUs</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/overclocking-guide-for-intel-lga1156-platform-cpus/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/overclocking-guide-for-intel-lga1156-platform-cpus/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaurav Bharadwaj ( Aka : ghost_z )]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides & Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=33</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>LGA 1156 CPU Overclocking guide.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/overclocking-guide-for-intel-lga1156-platform-cpus/">Overclocking Guide for Intel LGA1156 Platform CPUs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/overclocking-guide-for-intel-lga1156-platform-cpus/intel-7/" rel="attachment wp-att-34"><img decoding="async" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-34 aligncenter" title="Intel-7" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Intel-7-180x180.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="180" srcset="https://www.ocfreaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Intel-7-180x180.jpg 180w, https://www.ocfreaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Intel-7-300x300.jpg 300w, https://www.ocfreaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Intel-7-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.ocfreaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Intel-7.jpg 320w" sizes="(max-width: 180px) 100vw, 180px" /></a><br />
<span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Introduction</span></span></p>
<p>LGA1156 Platform was released way back in 2009 just 1 year after the release of LGA1366 Platform.</p>
<p>The main differences between lga1156 and lga1366 are as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>Elimination of northbridge in lga 1156.</li>
<li>Only dual channel memory support.</li>
<li>Better turbo mode on lga1156.</li>
<li>Lower tdp of i7&#8217;s on lga1156(95watt opposed to 130 watt in 1366).</li>
</ol>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">This the list of cpu&#8217;s that belong to this platform</span></span></p>
<p>Core i3(Clarkdale)Dual cores with ht but no turbo:</p>
<ul>
<li>-i3 530</li>
<li>-i3 540</li>
</ul>
<p>Core i5(Clarkdale) Dual cores with HT and turbo:</p>
<ul>
<li>-i5 650</li>
<li>-i5 660</li>
<li>-i5 661</li>
<li>-i5 670</li>
</ul>
<p>Core i5(Lynfield) Quad cores with turbo but no HT:</p>
<ul>
<li>-i5 750</li>
<li>-i5 750</li>
</ul>
<p>Core i7(Lynfield) Quad cores with ht and turbo:</p>
<ul>
<li>-i7 860</li>
<li>-i7 870</li>
<li>-i7 875k</li>
<li>-i7 880</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">The chipsets supported are:</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li>P55&#8211;Mainly for core i7 and i5 lynfield versions,although you could run i3 and other i5&#8217;s too but you won&#8217;t be able to utilize the on cpu graphics unit.</li>
<li>H55&#8211;Mainly for non lynfield i5&#8217;s and i3&#8217;s as it supports on cpu graphics unit.</li>
<li>Two More chipsets are available but they are not much different,H57 and Q57.</li>
</ul>
<p>This concludes the intro.</p>
<div class="caution"><strong>Disclaimer:</strong> Although i guarantee that the info and method stated here are safe and correct,i will not be held responsible for any ocing adventure gone wrong.</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Setting Up Your System</span></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Goto bios(Press F10/Del/F2 at startup) and set everything at default then restart your pc.</li>
<li>Again goto bios and disable all power saving features,c-states etc ,.. then set all voltages from auto to normal in the bios except the PCH(discussed later), save settings and exit bios.</li>
<li>Disable or remove any unnecessary usb devices PNP devices that you don&#8217;t need.</li>
<li>Make sure you have adequate cooling and a good cpu cooler(advisable for system safety not mandatory).</li>
<li>Make sure you have a good cpu cooler installed before going for heavy overclocking(Eg. cooler master hyper 212+ evo)</li>
</ol>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Softwares/Utilities Required</span></span></p>
<p>1) <strong>Core Temp</strong>&#8211;Used to measure CPU temps.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/" target="_blank">http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/cnTxg.png" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p>2) <strong>HWMonitor</strong>&#8211;This gives temp and voltage info for the whole system including motherboard PCH temp.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html" target="_blank">http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/oBid6.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p>3) <strong>CPU-Z</strong>&#8211;Used for getting memory and cpu specific detailed info.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html" target="_blank">http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/25Mjb.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p>4) <strong>Prime95</strong>&#8211;A time tested and very good stability tester for cpu&#8217;s of any make and brand.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.overclock.net/t/137251/prime95" target="_blank">http://www.overclock.net/t/137251/prime95</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/TnEpi.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p>5) <strong>IBT</strong>(Intel Burn Test)&#8211;Includes linpack test which is apparently used by intel too for testing the processors.</p>
<p>This is better than Prime 95 as it takes much less time to find stability issues in the system.</p>
<p><a href="http://downloads.guru3d.com/IntelBurnTest-v2.3-download-2047.html" target="_blank">http://downloads.guru3d.com/IntelBur&#8230;load-2047.html</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/50uCg.png" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p>6) <strong>MEMTEST86+</strong>&#8211;Used to test the memory stability.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.memtest.org/" target="_blank">http://www.memtest.org/</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/0ecBm.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite">
<p><strong>Understanding Some Basic Stuff:</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Base Clock</strong>&#8211;This is your systems/motherboards primary frequency and essentially controls all other frequencies in the system.Also called(and depicted as in the bios) as bclk.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Multiplier</strong>&#8211;its a mathematical function which when multiplied by the bclk or Base Clock gives us a desired frequency for some component.For Eg: CPU Frequency,Memory Frequency.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>CPU Frequency</strong>&#8211;This value denotes the speed/frequency of the processor which is the product of bclk and cpu multiplier.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>QPI Link</strong>&#8211;This value is directly dependent and proportional to the baseclock this is the alternative to fsb on lga1156 and its more efficient.By increasing it you not only increase the stability of the pc but also increase the bandwidth between cpu and memory.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Memory Latency/Timings</strong>&#8211;This stated the wasted clock cycles in a particular memory configuration,the lower they are the better.</p>
<p><strong>Important Voltages:</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>VCORE</strong>&#8211;This is the amount of voltage given to the processor,very very important for ocing.</p>
<p>Well established safe limits&#8211;0-1.4volts.(although this may vary system wise and a lot of trial and error is required).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>QPI/VTT</strong>&#8211;This is the amount of voltage provided to the IMC(integrated memory controller) for stabilizing the qpi link,again very very important for ocing.</p>
<p>Well established safe limits&#8211;1.1-1.25volts.(although this may vary system wise and a lot of trial and error is required).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>DRAM/VDIMM</strong>&#8211;This is the amount of voltage given to the memory dimms.</p>
<p>Well established safe limits&#8211;1.5-1.65volts.(although this may vary system wise and a lot of trial and error is required).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>PCH</strong>&#8211;This is the amount of voltage given to the motherboard controller hub.This is basically responsible for communicating with different devices connected to motherboard except the GPU and CPU.</p>
</div>
<p>Well established safe limits&#8211;Its better to leave this at auto.(This setting can easily damage your board and components and do very less for ocing so its better left on at auto,sometimes when ocing beyond 4ghz+ and if your cpu is not stable this might help,no guarantees though).</p>
<div class="note"><strong>NOTE(IMP)</strong>: You should always keep in mind before ocing to not increase the DRAM/VDIMM voltage 0.5 volts over the QPI/VTT voltage.For Eg: If your QPI/VTT voltage is set to 1.1 then you should not increase the DRAM/VDIMM voltage beyond 1.6 volt.Not following this restriction can lead to a damaged cpu.</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<div class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Some Basic Rules Before Moving On</span></div>
<p>1) Don&#8217;t set a target in mind,ocing is a recursive process,there is no guarantee you will achieve your desired overclock.</p>
<p>2) If you know your mother board is weak then don&#8217;t take the bclk too high,rather increase CPU multiplier as much as you can to achieve the desired overclock.</p>
<p>3) If you know your mother board can take the heat then its always better for stability reasons to decrease your CPU multiplier as low as you can and increase the bclk to achieve ocing.</p>
<p>4) Before increasing the bclk set the CPU multiplier as low as possible and set the PCI frequency as auto.</p>
<p>5) Decrease the memory multiplier before hand too because when you start ocing through bclk every other clocks/frequencies in the system will also rise.</p>
<div class="note"><strong>NOTE:</strong> Basically we are lowering all system multipliers and frequencies before increasing bclk for compensating the increase which they would have due to increase in bclk,think of it as a precautionary measure and increasing stability.Set the PCI Frequency to auto as it will remain at 100 then.</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Finally Overclocking</span></span></p>
<div class="note"><strong>NOTE:</strong> Never use non bios/Window/O.S. based overclocking tools.</div>
<p>1) After reading the previously mentioned rules and setting up the bios multipliers and frequencies, goto Bios and start increasing bclk in steps of 5 or 10(if you are confident).Save settings then again enter bios.</p>
<p>2) Now after reentering bios check 3 frequencies every time you increase the bclk:</p>
<ol>
<li>CPU Frequency.</li>
<li>Memory Frequency.</li>
<li>PCI Frequency(although it is set to auto,doesn&#8217;t hurt to check for yourself to be extra sure).</li>
</ol>
<p>If everything is fine then move on to next step.</p>
<p>3) Save bios settings and exit then boot up windows,start cpuz and core temp and hwmonitor,let them run in the background.</p>
<p>4) Start Prime95 or IBT whichever you trust or like(imo ibt/linx are better):</p>
<div class="note">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;In case you chose Prime95</div>
<ol>
<li>Run it for at least 6 hours and check for errors or bsod&#8217;s or any decripency in system behaviour.</li>
<li>If you get any error/bsod then you might need to review your bios setting and try increasing vcore/qpi voltage a bit.</li>
<li>If you did not get any error then congratulations you have done your first successfull overclock.</li>
</ol>
<div class="note">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;In case you chose IBT</div>
<ol>
<li>Set the run times to 20(even 10 will do,but to be extra sure),and run it and then see for any errors bsod&#8217;s and any decripency in system behaviour.</li>
<li>If you get any error/bsod then you might need to review your bios setting and try increasing vcore/qpi voltage a bit.</li>
<li>If you did not get any error then congratulations you have done your first successfull overclock.</li>
</ol>
<p>5) Do steps 1-4 again and again till you stabilize the system(keeping voltage under safe range as stated by me in voltage section) and achieve your desired overclock.</p>
<p>6) In case your pc stops booting reset cmos by removing the battery in the motherboard and keep it out for 5 minutes and then put it back in and reboot.If your system still does not start it means something has gone kaput.</p>
<p>7) If you encounter step 6,its highly likely that either your power supply or motherboard were not upto the task or you have been overenthusiastic and pushed your system too hard.</p>
<p>This concludes ocing section.</p>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">End Notes</span></span></p>
<div class="note">
<p>Common BSOD&#8217;S/BCCODES</p>
<p>0x101 = increase vcore.</p>
<p>0x124 = increase/decrease vcore or QPI/VTT&#8230;have to test to see which one it is.</p>
<p>0x0A = unstable RAM/IMC, increase QPI first, if that doesn&#8217;t work increase vcore.</p>
<p>0x1E = increase vcore.</p>
<p>0x3B = increase vcore.</p>
<p>0xD1 = QPI/VTT, increase/decrease as necessary.</p>
<p>0x9C = QPI/VTT most likely, but increasing vcore has helped in some instances.</p>
<p>0x50 = RAM timings/Frequency or uncore multi unstable, increase RAM voltage or adjust QPI/VTT, or lower uncore if you&#8217;re higher than 2x.</p>
<p>0x116 = Low IOH (NB) voltage, GPU issue (most common when running multi-GPU/overclocking GPU).</p>
<p>0x00000109 = Not enough or too Much memory voltage.</p>
<p>0x7E = System Drivers issue.</p>
<p>0x24 = Disk corruption (Did you OC the PCI-E bus?).</p>
<p>0XC2 = Some s/w and/or driver related BSOD.</p>
</div>
<p>This concludes the guide.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/overclocking-guide-for-intel-lga1156-platform-cpus/">Overclocking Guide for Intel LGA1156 Platform CPUs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/overclocking-guide-for-intel-lga1156-platform-cpus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">33</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legacy Intel LGA 775 / AMD AMx CPU Overclocking Guide</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/legacy-intel-lga-775-amd-am2-overclocking-guide/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/legacy-intel-lga-775-amd-am2-overclocking-guide/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umang Gajera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides & Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=67</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Before I start the core just keep in mind &#8211; what the acronyms below mean(Just in case you are a complete noob like me ): &#8211; OCing = OverClocking &#8211; Northbridge = NB = MCH &#8211; Mobo = Motherboard &#8211; Proccy = Processor Legacy Intel LGA 775 Overclocking Basically Front Side Bus (FSB) is set [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/legacy-intel-lga-775-amd-am2-overclocking-guide/">Legacy Intel LGA 775 / AMD AMx CPU Overclocking Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I start the core just keep in mind &#8211; what the acronyms below mean(Just in case you are a complete noob like me ):</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite">
<ul>
<li>&#8211; OCing = OverClocking</li>
<li>&#8211; Northbridge = NB = MCH</li>
<li>&#8211; Mobo = Motherboard</li>
<li>&#8211; Proccy = Processor</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Legacy Intel LGA 775 Overclocking</span></span></p>
<p>Basically Front Side Bus (FSB) is set of wires i.e. a Bus that connects CPU to the “Northbridge(Chipset)”.By the way &#8211; Intel also calls the Northbridge as “Memory Controller Hub” or MCH for short.</p>
<p>Wait … what is the Northbridge in the first place?</p>
<div class="note">Hmm… If CPU is the brain of our computer then the Northbrigde(Chipset) is the Heart of your computer. The Northbridge is the bigger chip of the 2 in the chipset &#8211; the other being the southbridge. The Northbridge is the gateway/door for the CPU to access and control all the components inside the PC. If the Northbridge fails then the bridge between the CPU and other computer components breaks which renders the CPU a complete etched-silicon crap!</div>
<p>Now back to where I was …</p>
<p>This FSB is the address and data bus which the CPU uses. The CPU interacts with all the other components of the computer through the FSB via the Northbridge. Since the Northbridge is so central to all the connections in the computer &#8211; increasing the FSB will also increase the speed at which other components interact with the Northbridge which in turn will increase the system performance. Overclocking the FSB may be a little tricky for someone new because the base clock rate differs from the effective(actual) clock rate which is termed as ‘Quad-Pumping’ by Intel.</p>
<p>On systems that support Intel processors the FSB is Quad Pumped which can be stated as :</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>Quad Pumped FSB (QFSB) = 4 x Base FSB</strong></div>
<p>Hence for eg. a system running at 1333 MHz FSB has a base FSB frequency of 333 MHz.</p>
<p>One of the key factors that makes FSB the first choice to be overclocked is that the CPU’s speed is determined by the Base FSB which is then multiplied by the CPU Multiplier which sets the operating frequency of the CPU.This relation of proportionality between the CPU and FSB frequency gives an instant CPU speed boost when the FSB is increased given that the multiplier remains the same.</p>
<p>The formula is given as :</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>CPU Speed = Base FSB x CPU Multiplier</strong></div>
<p>The CPU multiplier is also referred to as CPU to FSB ratio in some BIOSes &#8211; its logical because if you divide CPU frequency with FSB freq what we get is the CPU Multiplier.</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>CPU Multiplier = CPU Speed : Base FSB</strong></div>
<p>Lets take an example of Q9300 which has native FSB of 1333 MHz (Quad Pumped) and Multiplier ‘Top-Locked’ to 7.5</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite">Now Base FSB = 333 MHz hence ,<br />
CPU speed = 333 x 7.5 = 2.5 GHz which is the stock speed for Q9300</div>
<p><strong>Native Processor FSB</strong> is the default FSB which is used to generate the CPU frequency. Each processor has its own predefined default FSB. When every thing is set to default &#8211; i.e. no Overclocking &#8211; the CPU dictates the Northbrigde that it wants to work at the default CPU FSB.</p>
<p>When is comes to FSB we are mainly concerned with max FSB supported by the motherboard and the native FSB of the processor. The Q9xx0 series Quads from Intel may have the edge of being 45nm based and slightly faster than the 65nm based Q6×00 series Quads. But the 45nm Quads have higher native FSB of 1333 MHz which makes it difficult to overclock beyond a limit and it even gets worse for quads like Q9300 which has the multiplier at 7.5 max. Consider today’s p35 , x38 , p45 , x48 chipset based motherboards which can be OCed to 1600MHz easily but not quite beyond 2000 MHz i.e. a Base FSB of 500 MHz is limit for the current generation chipsets. Now with Q9300 the ‘max possible (can be pushed more)’ overclock will be = 500 x 7.5 = 3.75 GHz which does not make it suitable for Overclocking because such a high FSB will tax both the chipset and also the RAM to maintain good FSB : DRAM ratios [ill explain RAM OCing in next Article].</p>
<p>On the other hand lets consider Q6600 which has 1066MHz with multiplier of 9 max. With Q6600 the ‘max possible’ OC will be = 500 x 9 = 4.5 GHz which some have reached. I remember that the Tom’s Hardware team from France managed to push Q6600 up to 5 GHz on liquid nitrogen. Due to this relation between the Base FSB and the CPU Multiplier the CPU having native FSB less then the max FSB supported by the motherboard has a more Overclocking head room than a CPU have native FSB same as the max FSB of the motherboard.</p>
<p>In our consideration of Q9300 and Q6600 I would go with Q6600 because its more Overclockable and will not tax the chipset with extreme high FSB as with Q9300. But on the other side the main advantage of Q9300 is the higher FSB itself. Since the native FSB of the processor dictates the default FSB at which the system will run having higher default FSB will make system run fast due to higher FSB. But the down fall is that further OC is possible from the default FSB , hence more the head room more is the Overclockability.</p>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> AMD With HTT </span></span></p>
<p>On AMD systems the bus used to interface the CPU with Northbridge uses HyperTransport Technology (HTT) which was earlier called Lighting Data Transport (LDT). This is similar to FSB on Intel systems which uses Assisted/Advanced Gunning Transreceiver Logic (AGTL+). On AMD systems the bus speed is the base HT speed from which we get the HT Link speed.</p>
<p>Here’s the formula :</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>HT Link freq = Base HT x HT(LDT) Multiplier</strong></div>
<p>Usually the HT multiplier swing is limited between 1 and 5(max).<br />
So if we have bus speed of 200 MHz and HT multiplier set to 5x then our HT link speed will be : <strong>200 x 5 = 1000 MHz </strong>HT Link</p>
<p>The HT link speed is used to get actual data rate of the system bus. Since HTT can transfer data twice per clock pulse (Double Data Rate) the effective can be calculated as :</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>HT Link x 2 (DDR) = Effective Bus Data Rate</strong></div>
<p>In our case we have: <strong>1000 MHz x 2 = 2000 MHz</strong> Effective Bus Data Rate</p>
<p>As on Intel systems the CPU speed here is also obtained by multiplying the CPU Multiplier with the bus speed (Base HT) which is as follows :</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>CPU speed = Base HT x CPU Multiplier</strong></div>
<p>Lets say we have an AMD X2 5000+ which has its multiplier set to 13 . Hence in our case the CPU would be : <strong>200 x 13 = 2600 MHz = 2.6 GHz</strong></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/legacy-intel-lga-775-amd-am2-overclocking-guide/">Legacy Intel LGA 775 / AMD AMx CPU Overclocking Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/legacy-intel-lga-775-amd-am2-overclocking-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">67</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Geforce Fermi GPU Overclocking Guide</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-geforce-fermi-gpu-overclocking-guide/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-geforce-fermi-gpu-overclocking-guide/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaurav Bharadwaj ( Aka : ghost_z )]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides & Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=65</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Introduction The fermi architecture was reavealed by Nvidia way back in 2009 and the first Nvidia GPU series to be based on that architecture was the GTX 4XX series.The first card to be released was the GTX 480,and later on various other cards were released.Then the GTX 5XX series was released not too long ago [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-geforce-fermi-gpu-overclocking-guide/">Nvidia Geforce Fermi GPU Overclocking Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="http://i.imgur.com/Z8vYx.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Introduction</span></span></p>
<p>The fermi architecture was reavealed by Nvidia way back in 2009 and the first Nvidia GPU series to be based on that architecture was the GTX 4XX series.The first card to be released was the GTX 480,and later on various other cards were released.Then the GTX 5XX series was released not too long ago with the first card being the GTX 580.</p>
<p><strong>Major differences Between previous gen GPU&#8217;s like GTX 2XX and the new fermi architecture are as follows :</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Fermi based cards have GDDR5 memory modules with ECC(Error Correction) capabilities while the older architectures had GDDR3 non ECC modules.</li>
<li>Fermi based cards had core clock and shader clock speeds interlocked in the ratio 1:2 while the older architectures need not be so.</li>
<li>Fermi based cards were the first ones to support OpenGL4 and DirectX11 API&#8217;S(Application Programming Interface).</li>
<li>Fermi based cards had tessellation units specifically for its hardware based implementation while the older architectures lacked it.</li>
</ol>
<p>Well there are many more differences but for the sake of simplicity these are the most important ones to be concerned about.</p>
<p><strong>List of GPU&#8217;s based on the Fermi architecture:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Dual GPU : GTX 590</li>
<li>High End : GTX 580,GTX 480,GTX 570,GTX 470</li>
<li>Mid End : GTX 560 TI,GTX 560,GTX 460,GTX 465,GTX 550 TI,GTS 450</li>
<li>Low End : GT 545,GT 440,GT 530,GT 430,GT 520,GT 510</li>
</ol>
<div class="caution"><strong>Disclaimer:</strong> Although i guarantee that the info and method stated here are safe and correct,i will not be held responsible for any ocing adventure gone wrong.</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<p><strong>Setting Up Your System :</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Firstly no BIOS adjustments required for the GPU OC unless you have changed your PCI bus frequency,if yes then change the PCI frequency to default.</li>
<li>Now login to windows and install some essential Softwares/Utilities(Discussed later on in the next section).</li>
<li>Now set all your card Frequencies to default/stock.</li>
</ol>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Softwares/Utilities Required:</span></span></p>
<p><strong>1)</strong> Geforce GPU Drivers&#8211;Do we need an explanation here .</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://www.geforce.com/Drivers" target="_blank">http://www.geforce.com/Drivers</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/xZbRu.png" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>2)</strong> MSI Afterburner&#8211;&#8220;The&#8221; best and &#8220;The&#8221; most user friendly OC&#8217;ing app available on earth.</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://downloads.guru3d.com/MSI-Afterburner-2.2.0-Beta-12-download-2850.html" target="_blank">http://downloads.guru3d.com/MSI-Afte&#8230;load-2850.html</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/Qc495.png" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>3)</strong>Unigine Heaven&#8211;A very good benchmark for DX11 Tessellation enabled GPU&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://unigine.com/products/heaven/download/" target="_blank">http://unigine.com/products/heaven/download/</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/AJwef.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>4)</strong>OCCT&#8211;A gem among stress testing apps,a very versatile GPU testing/stressing Tool.</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://www.ocbase.com/perestroika_en/index.php?Download" target="_blank">http://www.ocbase.com/perestroika_en/index.php?Download</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/GB9Cj.png" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>5)</strong> 3DMark11&#8211;A very Good DX11 GPU/CPU stresser.</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/" target="_blank">http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/SxocQ.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>6)</strong> GPU-Z&#8211;GPU monitoring Tool.</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/SysInfo/GPU-Z/" target="_blank">http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/SysInfo/GPU-Z/</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/nxv4u.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> Understanding Some Basic Stuff : </span></span></strong></p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>Core Frequency/Clock</strong>: This is the speed at which the graphics core will be working,OC&#8217;ing this entity will yield you highest performance gains when compared to other frequencies.<strong>Shader Frequency/Clock</strong> : This is the speed at the shader algorithms are able to reprogram the graphics pipeline,this is the second most important frequency to be taken into consideration while OC&#8217;ing.</p>
<p><strong>Memory Frequency/Clock</strong> : This is the speed at which the VRAM or the GPU&#8217;s RAM work,this is the least important frequency while OC&#8217;ing as it yields very very less gains in terms of performance.</p>
</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<div class="note">NOTE: I still see many people think of shaders as some hardware units but in reality they are nothing more than algorithms which are used to reprogram the graphics processing pipeline to achieve the desired shading effect.</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> Important Voltages </span></span></p>
<p><strong>GPU VCORE</strong> : Its the amount of volts fed into the GPU&#8217;s core,its the most Important voltage for OC&#8217;ing GPU&#8217;s.</p>
<p><strong>Safe Limit : Stock &#8211; 1.1Volts</strong></p>
<div class="note">NOTE: In some Non Reference PCB based GPU&#8217;s you have 2 additional voltage adjustment options.</div>
<p>Mem Volt-Important for OC&#8217;ing memory.</p>
<p>PLL Volt-Its just a gimmick by the manufacturers ,till now there has been no evidence of the card being able to OC higher and be stable by increasing the PLL Voltage.</p>
<p><strong>Some Basic Rules Before Moving On</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Don&#8217;t set a target in mind,OC&#8217;ing is a recursive process,there is no guarantee you will achieve your desired overclock.</li>
<li>Make sure your GPU temps are within 85C before any overclock @ stock,because if your cards already above 85C at stock,there won&#8217;t be much overclock headroom available to you,it does not mean your card can&#8217;t overclock,but it means that its not too safe to run your GPU at 90-100C 24X7.</li>
<li>Make sure your GPU is dust free as dust will add in to the temps of your GPU.</li>
</ol>
<div class="note">NOTE: Please note that overclocking any component/GPU in your system voids its warranty but there is a great loophole in this which guyz like us can use to RMA our card if its bricked,unless your card is burned or physically damaged there is no way of telling that your card was oced and as a result it went off,so be smart when going to RMA centers just don&#8217;t tell them that you oced,make some sensible excuses,like my card artifacts or it won&#8217;t boot etc etc.</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> Finally Overclocking </span></span></p>
<p><strong>&#8212;&#8211;Without Messing With The Voltages</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>1) After booting into windows start GPU-Z and Afterburner,close any unnecessary applications,verify your cards stock clocks and voltage.Also update your GPU drivers.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>2) Now to start OCing bring afterburner into view and you will see 4 sliders by defaults namely</li>
</ul>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
<ol>
<li>Core Clock</li>
<li>Shader Clock</li>
<li>Memory Clock</li>
<li>Fan Speed</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Here our aim will be to stabilize all the clocks one by one.We start with core clock(core and shader clocks are linked so essentially you will be increasing both automatically if you increase any one of those).</p>
<ul>
<li>3) Start raising the core clock speed 10 MHz at a time(you can also increase more if you are feeling adventurous but increasing in lower steps ensure that you will find more stable and safer highest frequency).After each increment run 2 loops of unigine heaven and 3dmark vantage/11 benchmarks,as these will immediately show the stability of your GPU OC by either crashing/slowing down/texture corruption or any graphical anomalies.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>4) Repeat the above step till you GPU OC passes all the tests without any problem,after you start getting problem reduce the core clock in increments of 5 MHz and again run 2 loops of unigine and 3dmark benchmarks each,and keep decrementing till your card becomes stable and stops artifacting or giving any problem.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>5) Through the last step we have now successfully found out our stable and highest core clock ceiling.So now in a way we have isolated the core clock from memory clock as memory clock have been untouched till now.So now start incrementing memory clock in increments of 10 MHz(Please don&#8217;t be over adventurous with memory like with core clock,memory is the component which can be easily destroyed by the slightest of mistake).Now repeat the same benchmark runs and strategy followed for core clock in earlier steps and you would have found out your memory clock ceiling too.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>6) Congratulations! you have achieved a stable OC on your GPU without messing with voltages.Now to keep these settings click &#8220;Apply Overclocking At Startup&#8221; in afterburner,and save the OC settings in a profile represented in afterburner as numbers at the bottom.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>&#8212;&#8211;With Messing With The Voltages</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>1) Here we follow the above 6 steps word to word and follow up from there.Now that we have got stable OC without increasing voltages,and if we need even higher OC then we need to up the voltage in small increments.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>2) Now for this we need to make some changes in the options of afterburner,click options in afterburner and then under the generals tab check the &#8220;unlock voltage and enable voltage monitoring options&#8221;.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>3) After setting up afterburner increase the core clock by 10 MHz again and again benchmark it and see if it crashes,if it does increase the voltage in increments of 5 mV and then again benchmark and see if the card has stabilized or not.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>4) Repeat the procedure given above till either you reach your desired OC or you reach 1.1 V.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>5) Once you reach the max possible OC apart from running the benchmarks also run OCCT GPU test for at least 30 minutes and check the stability of the card,if it survives well you have achieved a successful Overclock,if it does not decrement the core clocks by 5 MHz and keep doing this till your GPU is stable.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>6) Final step enjoy gaming with increased performance .</li>
</ul>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-geforce-fermi-gpu-overclocking-guide/">Nvidia Geforce Fermi GPU Overclocking Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-geforce-fermi-gpu-overclocking-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">65</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>RAM Overclocking Guide / Tutorial</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/ram-overclocking-guide-tutorial/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/ram-overclocking-guide-tutorial/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umang Gajera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides & Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=30</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Guide on Overclocking DDR1 , DDR2 and DDR3 Rams.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/ram-overclocking-guide-tutorial/">RAM Overclocking Guide / Tutorial</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="Ram" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/ram.jpg" alt="" width="461" height="249" /><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> SECTION 1 : </span></span><br />
When it comes to RAM OCing we mainly concerned with :</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>RAM Clock Frequencies ,</strong></li>
<li><strong>RAM Timings/Latencies ,</strong></li>
<li><strong>FSB : DRAM ratio ,</strong></li>
<li><strong>SPD Chip ,</strong></li>
<li><strong>and Voltage.</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>DDR(1/2/3) RAM modules have 3 types of ‘clocks’ associated with them:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>The first is DRAM Core clock or memory Clock. </strong></li>
<li><strong>The second comes I/O Bus clock. </strong></li>
<li><strong>Finally the 3rd is the Effective Data Rate.</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>The prime difference between DDR1 and DDR2 is that DDR2 can run its I/O bus clock twice the memory clock but with higher latencies and DDR2 has prefetch size of 4 bits as opposed to DDR1’s 2 bits. And the the main difference between DDR2 and DDR3 is that DDR3 can run its I/O bus clock at four times the memory clock but with higher latencies and DDR3’s prefetch buffer is 8 bits deep. </p>
<p><strong><em>For DDR2 :</em></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> I/O Bus Clock = DRAM Core Clock x 2 </strong></span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> Data Rate = I/O Bus Clock x 2 (i.e ‘DDR’) </strong></span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> Data Rate = 4(bits per clock) x I/O Bus Rate [4n prefetch]</strong></span></li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>For DDR3 &#038; DDR4 :</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> I/O Bus Clock = DRAM Core Clock x 4 </strong></span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> Data Rate = I/O Bus Clock x 2 (i.e ‘DDR’)</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> Data Rate = 8(bits per clock) x I/O Bus Rate [8n prefetch]</strong></span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Here Onwards, Whenever I Refer ‘Base Memory Clock’ or ‘I/O Bus Clock’ Or ‘DRAM Frequency’ ALL MEAN THE SAME.</strong></p>
<p><strong>For DDR(1\2\3\4)-SD-RAM the data rate is twice the base clock rate.</strong></p>
<p>For e.g. RAM running at <strong>DRAM Frequency (Base Memory Clock) of 400 Mhz</strong> has an <strong>effective (data rate) Frequency of 800 Mhz i.e. effective signalling rate of 800 MT/s [MegaTransfers per Second]</strong>.</p>
<div class="highlight">
<p><strong>Limits for DDR2, DDR3 &#038; DDR4 :</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>For <strong><em>DDR2 RAM</em></strong> modules the official max frequency is <strong><span style="color: #0087bd;">800 Mhz</span> (Jedec)</strong> while it can reach to <strong>1200 Mhz</strong> when overclocked.</li>
<li>For <strong><em>DDR3 RAM</em></strong> modules the official max frequency is <strong><span style="color:#0087bd;">1600 Mhz</span> (Jedec)</strong> but can reach <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>2500Mhz+</strong></span> with better ICs when overclocked </li>
<li>For <strong><em>DDR4 RAM</em></strong> modules the official max frequency is <strong><span style="color: #0087bd;">3200 Mhz</span> (Jedec)</strong> but now we have module that can go past <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>4000 Mhz</strong></span>  with binned ICs.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>Before going further into details I’d like you to have a look on the screen shot that I have taken on my PC for explanation so that you can understand better; that’s what I hope!</p>
<p><strong>Screenshot 1: Showing the SPD chip readings and memory details. </strong></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/guide_tutorial/ram_overclocking/ram_spd.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>Screenshot 2: Showing the ‘current’ RAM timings , frequency and FSB : RAM ratio.</strong></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/guide_tutorial/ram_overclocking/ram_settings.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">SECTION 2 : Ram Timings </span></span></p>
<p>When it comes to Overclocking RAM we are just concerned with <strong>4</strong>(out of many) primary timings as seen in <strong>screenshot 2</strong>. The chips used on the DDR ram modules have different types of timings(Primary &#038; Secondary) which give us a sense of the speed of ram along with its stability and rated frequency of-course. When it comes to overclocking <strong>loosening(increasing)</strong> the timings is very effective for increasing the RAM frequency making the modules stable at high frequencies and on the contrary reducing the RAM frequency the timings can be <strong>tightened (lowered)</strong>. But ironically lowering the timings decreases access time but at the cost of the bandwidth.</p>
<p><em>Now lets get a feel of some of the<strong> Signals(strobes)</strong> for RAM:</em></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>/CAS[Active low]</strong> : Column access strobe(signal) When this signal goes low , the column in the selected row is ready to be accessed in burst mode of 2 , 4 or 8.</li>
<li><strong>/RAS[Active low]</strong> : Row access strobe(signal)</li>
<li><strong>Precharge</strong> : Used to activate/deactivate a row in the selected bank before it can be used for read/write operation.</li>
</ol>
<p>These timings are specified are in the following order : <strong>tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS</strong> and as you have guessed <strong>‘t’</strong> stands for time. <strong></strong></p>
<div class="special sp_blue notestar"> <strong>NOTE:</strong> All latencies are in terms of clock cycles and actually derived from the current bus speed which is in nanoseconds.For e.g. CAS latency(which is explained below) in nano seconds from clock cycles can be found as follows:<br />
<span style="font-size:15px;" class="aligncenter"><strong>CAS Latency in ns = CAS delay in cycles x time taken for 1 cycle</strong></span><br />
But time period is inverse of frequency; Hence we get,<br />
<span style="font-size:15px;"><strong> CAS Latency in ns = CAS Latency in cycles x [Bus Frequency] <sup> –1</sup></strong></span><br />
Finally,<br />
<span style="font-size:15px;"><strong>CAS LAtency in ns = CAS Latency in cycle / Bus Frequency</strong></span>
</div>
<p>The 4 important timings with respect to RAM Overclocking are :</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>t-CL [CAS Latency]<em> : It is time elapsed between the memory controller sending the address of the column and the data that &#8220;first&#8221; arrives in response</em>. </strong>Since data is sequentially placed in memory and a row contains sequential data so its quite simple to catch the fact that columns will be switched more frequently than rows so CAS will have a big impact on performance. Though some say that CL is not that important, but generally it is and its only in the case of bizarre memory access patterns that CL may become less significant.
<div class="highlight">
<strong>Typical t-CL Values in clock cycles :</strong></p>
<ul style="margin-bottom:0px">
<li>DDR1 &#8211; 2,3</li>
<li>DDR2 &#8211; 4 to 6</li>
<li>DDR3 &#8211; 6 to 10</li>
<li>DDR4 &#8211; 10 to 18</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</li>
<li><strong>t-RCD [RAS to CAS Delay]</strong> : <strong><em>It is the amount of delay between a RAS and a CAS.</em></strong>=or= Simply speaking it is the time taken to select a particular row first and then selecting the particular column for data access. It doesn’t have a huge impact on performance.
<div class="highlight">
<strong>Typical t-RCD Values in clock cycles :</strong></p>
<ul style="margin-bottom:0px">
<li>DDR1 &#8211; 2 to 4</li>
<li>DDR2 &#8211; 3 to 5</li>
<li>DDR3 &#8211; 6 to 10</li>
<li>DDR4 &#8211; 10 to 18</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</li>
<li><strong>t-RP [RAS Precharge Time]</strong> : <strong><em>It is the time required to deactivate the current row and activate next row.</em></strong><br />
=or=<br />
Simply delay caused by switching between rows.</p>
<div class="highlight">
<strong>Typical t-RP Values in clock cycles :</strong></p>
<ul style="margin-bottom:0px">
<li>DDR1 &#8211; 2 to 4</li>
<li>DDR2 &#8211; 3 to 5</li>
<li>DDR3 &#8211; 6 to 10</li>
<li>DDR4 &#8211; 10 to 18</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</li>
<li><strong>t-RAS [Active to Precharge Delay / Row Active Time]</strong> : <strong><em>Time required between an active and a precharge command.</em></strong><br />
=or=<br />
The time taken between 2 memory access / Data requests.<br />
=or=<br />
The time taken to activate a memory bank(row) and then deactivating it. It affects stability more than performance. It is approximately equal to <strong>tCL + rRCD + tRP [=&gt;tRAS]</strong> while in some cases it may not be so. And here&#8217;s a quote from a wiki article : </p>
<blockquote><p> <strong><em>“in practice for DDR RAM Modules , it should be set to at least tRCD + tCAS + 2 to allow enough time for data to get streamed out”</em></strong></p></blockquote>
<div class="highlight">
<strong>Typical t-RAS values in cycles :</strong></p>
<ul style="margin-bottom:0px">
<li>DDR1 &#8211; 5 to 12</li>
<li>DDR2 &#8211; 10 to 19</li>
<li>DDR3 &#8211; 15 to 30</li>
<li>DDR4 &#8211; 20 to 36</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<h2 class="shead">SECTION 3A : FSB:DRAM Ratio on Legacy Systems </h2>
<p>In case of legacy systems where the memory controller was present on the northbridge, while talking about FSB : DRAM ratio we are concerned with the base FSB frequency and the DRAM frequency (base clock rate).This ratio tells us <strong>“who is running faster than whom” </strong>and when DRAM frequency is more than base FSB or both are the same then we won’t have any issues with system performance. Depending on both the frequencies, FSB : DRAM ratio can yield any one of the 2 operating modes which are Synchronous and Asynchronous. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Synchronous Mode: (sync)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>In sync mode both the frequencies are equal which means that both the RAM and FSB are running synchronously and yields max performance.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Asynchronous Mode: (async)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Note that Async mode can give either max performance or average performance as follows:
<ul>
<li>If the FSB frequency is more than DRAM frequency then u’ll get average or poor performance because FSB(hence CPU) is running faster than RAM and so RAM cannot cope with data hungry CPU’s requests and eventually CPU has wait i.e be in a idle state for a while till the data arrives from RAM.</li>
<li>If the DRAM frequency is more or equal to FSB clock speed then u’ll get max performance since here CPU doesn’t have be idle in between and also DRAM being faster than FSB is not a concern since CPU will read/write data at FSB’s rate.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Common FSB ratios :</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>3:4 -&gt; For each 4 DRAM ticks , FSB ticks at rate of 3 </strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>2:3 -&gt; FSB is at 266 Mhz and DRAM is at 400 Mhz</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>1:1 -&gt; Both are equal for e.g both running …at say 266 Mhz</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>5:4 -&gt; You can guess this!</strong></em></li>
</ul>
<h2 class="shead">SECTION 3B : FSB:DRAM Ratio on current Systems </h2>
<p>On Current systems be it Intel or AMD where the Memory controller is integrated completely inside the CPU die, the significance of FSB:DRAM ratio has changed. What we used to call FSB is now QPI(Quick path interconnect) on Intel systems and for AMD systems we call it HyperTransport(HT). Now its just a ratio of Base Clock (BCLK) to Memory Clock. </p>
<div class="special sp_blue noteinfo"> AMD was the first one to move Memory Controller inside the CPU using Hyper Transport(HT). Years later Intel followed when finally Memory Controller was integrated with CPU, with the release of their Nehalem architecture. </div>
<h2 class="shead">SECTION 4 : Ram Voltages </h2>
<p>This is the last thing you wanna mess with , after it being configured according to the EPP or XMP profile. Generally voltage increase must be limited to <strong>8% to 10%</strong> of the max supported voltage according to EPP or XMP Profile and you must make sure that the chips on the RAM modues supports this level of voltage increment else you will end up damaging it. For DDR2 for Mobos which support Core2 architecture <strong>2.1/2.2/2.3 V is safest maximum</strong> but this doesn’t mean all RAMs have this as their max safe limit. The safest max voltage depends on the chips used by the manufacturer. For <strong>DDR2</strong> generally the default is <strong>1.8V</strong> while for <strong>DDR3</strong> its <strong>1.5V</strong> . It again majorly depends on the chips used for the modules. But i’d say <strong>never-ever do this</strong> until you have enough experience and know about various chips. Instead set the RAM’s voltage according to EPP/XMP profile if not set.</p>
<p>Standard JEDEC &amp; Oveclocked Voltages :</p>
<ul>
<li>For <strong>DDR1 &#8211; Jedec = <span style="color: #00cc00;">2.5V</span> | OC = <span style="color: #ff0033;">3.2v Max</span> </strong></li>
<li>For <strong>DDR2 &#8211; Jedec = <span style="color: #00cc00;">1.8V</span> | OC = <span style="color: #ff0033;">2.3V Max</span> , <span style="color: #ff9900;">1.8V~2.2V</span> is ‘just safe’ for 24/7</strong></li>
<li>For <strong>DDR3 &#8211; Jedec = <span style="color: #00cc00;">1.5V</span> | OC = <span style="color: #ff0033;">2.1V Max</span> , <span style="color: #ff9900;">1.5~2.0V</span> is ‘just safe’for 24/7 while on some systems <span style="color: #ff0033;">1.65V+</span> may be fatal (old corei7 LGA1366 systems). </strong></li>
<li>For <strong>DDR4 &#8211; Jedec = <span style="color: #00cc00;">1.2V</span> | OC = <span style="color: #ff0033;">1.35v-1.40v Max</span> , <span style="color: #ff9900;">1.2~1.35V</span> is ‘just safe’for 24/7 while it seems that going over<span style="color: #ff0033;">1.5V</span> might be serious risky stuff. </strong></li>
</ul>
<h2 class="shead">SECTION 5 : A Word On SPD &#038; XMP/EPP Profiles</h2>
<p>SPD is the acronym for <em><strong>Serial Presence Detect</strong></em>. SPD chips are now commonly found on the SDRAM DIMM Modules. Its job is to store the RAM settings for different frequency and voltages. SPD makes it easier for bios to configure RAM for the system. Apart from the <strong>JEDEC</strong> standard profiles SPD also contains <strong>EPP or XMP profiles</strong>. <strong><em>EPP is Enhanced Performance Profile</em></strong> which can be read by some Nvidia and AMD chipsets and configures the RAM according to it. If not supported then BIOS just loads the default configuration. EPP is present on RAM modules which are marketed as <strong>“SLI ready”</strong> or <strong>“Crossfire ready”</strong> which is just a marketing thing then any thing else. If the Motherboard cannot read EPP it does not mean that the RAM cannot be configured as per the EPP. In this case we just have to configure it <strong>manually</strong>. XMP is Intel’s substitute for <strong><em>EPP which is short for eXtreme Memory Profile</em></strong>. </p>
<p>The use of EPP/XMP is just to get the RAM configured for max performance at its rate specifications which are often beyond the standard Jedec specs for Overclocking grade RAMs. When you first install High-speed memory sticks, they will run at &#8216;default&#8217; Jedec speeds. To configure your RAM sticks at the rated speed you will have enter BIOS and apply the XMP profile. This setting is usually present under the Overclocking/Tweaking section of your BIOS. Many RAM sticks have multiple XMP profiles; so just choose the best one available, which will provide a baseline setting for overclocking. <strong>Screenshot-1 shows</strong> <em>SPD profiles</em> of my RAM.</p>
<p>Here is my BIOS screenshot showing XMP profiles available to select from:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/guide_tutorial/ram_overclocking/xmp_profiles_bios.jpg" alt="RAM XMP Profiles as shown in BIOS" class="aligncenter" width=600px /></p>
<h2 class="shead">SECTION 6 : How do we do it? </h2>
<p>After getting equipped with the knowledge presented above its time to do some RAM Overclocking which is straight forward.</p>
<p>I like to do it in 2 cycle fashion:<br />
<strong>CYCLE A:</strong> Find your Overclock settings at rated Voltage.<br />
<strong>CYCLE B:</strong> Find your max Overclock at bumped up Voltages past your Overclock at rated Voltages.</p>
<p>The following Steps Integrate both these Cycles:</p>
<ul>
<strong>Pre-requisite</strong> : If applicable, First apply the XMP/EPP profile for your RAM from BIOS.</p>
<li><strong>1)</strong> Now, Increase the frequency to next available increment from the list. This setting is usually called &#8220;DRAM frequency&#8221;. On Some systems it may be called &#8220;Memory multiplier&#8221; where you will need to select the next multiplier value in the list. You can fine tune the values of these increments by changing the FSB or BaseClock as mentioned in STEP 8.<br />
<img decoding="async" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/guide_tutorial/ram_overclocking/ram_freq_increments_bios.jpg" alt="RAM frequency increments as shown in BIOS" class="aligncenter" width=600px />
</li>
<li><strong>2)</strong> If the system is stable then, run all the necessary <strong>stability tests</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>3)</strong> If tests are successful repeat <strong>step 1</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>4)</strong> If tests fail i.e. system crashes(unstable) during testing then <strong>loosen(increase) the timings</strong>. You can increase the 4 timings mentioned above by 1-1-1-2 or 1-1-1-3 receptively and repeat until you get stability.<br />
<img decoding="async" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/guide_tutorial/ram_overclocking/ram_timings_bios.jpg" alt="RAM timings as shown in BIOS" class="aligncenter" width=600px />
</li>
<li><strong>5)</strong> Now start again from <strong>step 2</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>5.1)</strong> Some where here you must get a <strong>stable overclock</strong>. Now if you want you can repeat the process again from Step 1.</li>
<li><strong>6)</strong> If you want to Overclock memory further and/or if system crashes after <strong>step 5</strong> its time to increase voltage &#8211; AT YOUR OWN RISK!</li>
<li><strong>7)</strong> Increment DRAM voltage in steps of <strong>0.05v or 0.02v</strong> depending on your memory module [BEWARE].</li>
<li><strong>7.1)</strong> If system is unstable or if sometimes you get: &#8220;Overclocking failed&#8221; in BIOS during boot then, it may be time to increase IO voltage. This is essentially the memory controller voltage. On Current systems(CPU with IMC) its generally called VCCIO in most BIOSes. On Legacy systems its the Northbridge Voltage or NB Voltage. Initially try with 1% to 2% bumps. Consult the Motherboard manual and/or CPU datasheet for absolute max IO Voltage. Its better to ask experienced fellow Overclockers who own the same(nearly) system as your. </li>
<li><strong>7.2)</strong> You can stop after <strong>step 7</strong> or proceed further for some more insanity.</li>
<li><strong>8)</strong> You can adjust your FSB or Base Clock(BCLK) and repeat from <strong>step 2 =or= step 1</strong> for memory frequency fine tuning. On some systems (before Skylake) the Base Clock is tied to PCIE &#038; DMI, hence you don&#8217;t have much headroom to overclock your Base Clock(BLCK). If not obvious, please note that increasing your base clock will also increase your CPU speed.</li>
<li><strong>9)</strong><strong> After this you would have pushed your RAM to its limits and a little more OCing would seriously damage your RAM or even worse your CPU with integrated memory controller.</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>RAM stability test and other Utilities:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.memtest86.com/" target="_blank">http://www.memtest86.com/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://hcidesign.com/memtest/" target="_blank">http://hcidesign.com/memtest/</a></li>
<li>Prime95 &#8211; for CPU Benchmarking &#038; stability test | Link : <a href="http://mersenne.org/" target="_blank">http://mersenne.org</a></li>
<li>CPUZ &#8211; Gives you all your hardware info | Link : <a href="http://cpuid.org/" target="_blank">http://cpuid.org</a></li>
</ul>
<div class="special sp_red notewarning"><strong>Disclaimer </strong>: Though Overclocking is considerably safe these days &#8230; but fiddling around with Voltages.. be it CPU , Mobo or RAM is still a bit dangerous and can induce fatal damage in your hardware or even worse can render it useless. I will not take any responsibility if you damage your system after overclocking. PLAY SAFE Do not Bother Voltage increments!</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/ram-overclocking-guide-tutorial/">RAM Overclocking Guide / Tutorial</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/ram-overclocking-guide-tutorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">30</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.ocfreaks.com @ 2026-03-05 23:35:02 by W3 Total Cache
-->