<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RAM - OCFreaks!</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/tag/ram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/tag/ram/</link>
	<description>Overclocking , Gaming , Technology , Robotics &#38; DIY!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2017 16:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.4</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">42777727</site>	<item>
		<title>HyperX Releases ‘FURY’ Memory Line :marks the end for &#8220;Hyper X Blu&#8221; memory line</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/hyperx-releases-fury-memory-line-marks-the-end-for-hyper-x-blu-memory-line/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/hyperx-releases-fury-memory-line-marks-the-end-for-hyper-x-blu-memory-line/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=2164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kingston Unleashes Fury to the world.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/hyperx-releases-fury-memory-line-marks-the-end-for-hyper-x-blu-memory-line/">HyperX Releases ‘FURY’ Memory Line :marks the end for &#8220;Hyper X Blu&#8221; memory line</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/misc/hyperx_logo.jpg" width="500" height="201" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>HyperX<sup>®</sup>, a division of Kingston Technology, today, announced the launch of <a href="http://www.kingston.com/en/hyperx/memory/fury">HyperX FURY</a> memory for entry-level gamers and enthusiasts in India. <em><strong>HyperX FURY replaces the HyperX blu memory line</strong></em>. This next-generation high-performance memory offers automatic overclocking with an asymmetric and aggressive heatspreader design for the ultimate cost-efficient enthusiast computing experience.</p>
<p>HyperX FURY memory is completely Plug and Play (PnP) so it automatically overclocks within the system speed allowance without any manual BIOS tuning. The new heatspreader design comes in four colors (blue, black, red, and white) and features black PCB to enable gamers, modders and system builders to have color matched systems. HyperX FURY is available in 1333MHz, 1600MHz and 1866MHz frequencies.The HyperX FURY system memory will soon be joined by HyperX FURY SSD, designed also for entry-level gamers and enthusiasts who want to get into the game quicker. HyperX FURY SSD allows PCs and applications to load faster and improve overall system responsiveness.</p>
<p>So basically we can expect a new line of SSD&#8217;s in a few months too.<br />
until that time we would have to wait.</p>
<p>Specification:</p>
<table width="584" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="5" valign="top" width="584"><b>HyperX FURY*</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116"></td>
<td valign="top" width="120"><b>White</b></td>
<td valign="top" width="114"><b>Black</b></td>
<td valign="top" width="120"><b>Red</b></td>
<td valign="top" width="114"><b>Blue</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116"><b>Description</b></td>
<td valign="top" width="120"></td>
<td valign="top" width="114"></td>
<td valign="top" width="120"></td>
<td valign="top" width="114"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">4GB DIMM 1333</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX313C9FW/4</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX313C9FB/4</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX313C9FR/4</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX313C9F/4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">8GB DIMM 1333</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX313C9FW/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX313C9FB/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX313C9FR/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX313C9F/8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">8GB Kit of 2 1333</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX313C9FWK2/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX313C9FBK2/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX313C9FRK2/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX313C9FK2/8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">16GB Kit of 2 1333</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX313C9FWK2/16</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX313C9FBK2/16</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX313C9FRK2/16</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX313C9FK2/16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116"></td>
<td valign="top" width="120"></td>
<td valign="top" width="114"></td>
<td valign="top" width="120"></td>
<td valign="top" width="114"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">4GB DIMM 1600</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX316C10FW/4</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX316C10FB/4</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX316C10FR/4</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX316C10F/4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">8GB DIMM 1600</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX316C10FW/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX316C10FB/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX316C10FR/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX316C10F/8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">8GB Kit of 2 1600</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX316C10FWK2/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX316C10FBK2/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX316C10FRK2/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX316C10FK2/8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">16GB Kit of 2 1600</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX316C10FWK2/16</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX316C10FBK2/16</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX316C10FRK2/16</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX316C10FK2/16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116"></td>
<td valign="top" width="120"></td>
<td valign="top" width="114"></td>
<td valign="top" width="120"></td>
<td valign="top" width="114"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">4GB DIMM 1866</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX318C10FW/4</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX318C10FB/4</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX318C10FR/4</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX318C10F/4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">8GB DIMM1866</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX318C10FW/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX318C10FB/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX318C10FR/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX318C10F/8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">8GB Kit of 2 1866</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX318C10FWK2/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX318C10FBK2/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX318C10FRK2/8</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX318C10FK2/8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="116">16GB Kit of 2 1866</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX318C10FWK2/16</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX318C10FBK2/16</td>
<td valign="top" width="120">HX318C10FRK2/16</td>
<td valign="top" width="114">HX318C10FK2/16</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> <img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/misc/hyperx_fury.jpg" width="500" height="333" /></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/hyperx-releases-fury-memory-line-marks-the-end-for-hyper-x-blu-memory-line/">HyperX Releases ‘FURY’ Memory Line :marks the end for &#8220;Hyper X Blu&#8221; memory line</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/hyperx-releases-fury-memory-line-marks-the-end-for-hyper-x-blu-memory-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2164</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>G.SKILL RipjawsX 2133MHz CL9 8GB(4GBX2) Kit Review AMD Platform</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/g-skill-ripjawsx-2133mhz-cl9-8gb4gbx2-kit-review-amd-platform/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/g-skill-ripjawsx-2133mhz-cl9-8gb4gbx2-kit-review-amd-platform/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prathamesh Patil ( Aka: Mastermind )]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2013 14:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=1561</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>G.SKILL RipjawsX 2133MHz CL9 8GB(4GBX2) Kit Reviewed on AMD Platform by Prathamesh - Mastermind!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/g-skill-ripjawsx-2133mhz-cl9-8gb4gbx2-kit-review-amd-platform/">G.SKILL RipjawsX 2133MHz CL9 8GB(4GBX2) Kit Review AMD Platform</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction--><br />
<img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/gskill-2133-ripjawsx/cover.jpg" /></p>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Introduction</span></span></p>
<p>Hello guys! Today I am going to review a kit of memory modules from G.SKILL(on AMD based system). The kit which I have is : <strong>G.SKILL RipjawsX 2133MHz CL9-11-10-24 2N 8GB(4GBX2) Kit</strong>. G.SKILL has been a pioneer in making memory modules for desktop computers. Many enthusiasts and overclockers use the memory modules from G.SKILL in their rigs for overclocking, benchmarking and gaming.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" width="500" src="http://i.imgur.com/1vTCl2E.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong>Technical Specifications:</strong><br />
<center></p>
<table>
<tr>
</tr>
<tr>
</tr>
<tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Series</td>
<td>RipjawsX</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Memory Type</td>
<td>DDR3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Capacity</td>
<td>8GB (4GBx2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Multi-Channel Kit</td>
<td>Dual Channel Kit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tested Speed</td>
<td>2133MHz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tested Latency</td>
<td>9-11-10-28-2N</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tested Voltage</td>
<td>1.65V</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Registered/Unbuffered</td>
<td>Unbuffered</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Error Checking</td>
<td>Non-ECC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SPD Speed</td>
<td>1600MHz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SPD Voltage</td>
<td>1.50V</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fan lncluded</td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Height</td>
<td>40 mm / 1.58 inch</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Warranty</td>
<td>Lifetime</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Features</td>
<td>Intel XMP (Extreme Memory Profile) Ready</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/g-skill-ripjawsx-2133mhz-cl9-8gb4gbx2-kit-review-amd-platform/">G.SKILL RipjawsX 2133MHz CL9 8GB(4GBX2) Kit Review AMD Platform</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/g-skill-ripjawsx-2133mhz-cl9-8gb4gbx2-kit-review-amd-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1561</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Performance Edition 1600 Mhz DDR3 Ram review</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/amd-performance-edition-1600-mhz-ddr3-ram-review/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=780</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Amd Performance Edition Ram tested!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/amd-performance-edition-1600-mhz-ddr3-ram-review/">AMD Performance Edition 1600 Mhz DDR3 Ram review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction--></p>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">AMD Performance Edition RAM Reviewed!</span></span></p>
<p>Hey there people!</p>
<p>how&#8217;s life going?</p>
<p>First of all a very Happy New year from the team and lets hope we can bring you more exciting reviews this year. Today on the test bench we have a new kits of ram from AMD. Its a Mainstream kit running at a modest 1600Mhz Cl8. Lets see how it stacks up!</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/amd-ram/s/header.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="header" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/amd-ram/s/header.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="190" /></a></p>
<p>Read on&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/amd-performance-edition-1600-mhz-ddr3-ram-review/">AMD Performance Edition 1600 Mhz DDR3 Ram review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">780</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kingston HyperX blu PC3-12800 (1600MHz) 8GB Kit review</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/kingston-hyperx-blu-pc3-12800-1600mhz-8gb-kit-review/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/kingston-hyperx-blu-pc3-12800-1600mhz-8gb-kit-review/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A review on the little powerhouse from the stable of Kingston which can churn out some serious numbers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/kingston-hyperx-blu-pc3-12800-1600mhz-8gb-kit-review/">Kingston HyperX blu PC3-12800 (1600MHz) 8GB Kit review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction--></p>
<p>Whenever we say Kingston the main thing that flashes in our mind is its name in the memory market.Started in 1987 this company started with one single product and gradually branched into anything and everything that uses memory,be it high performances USB drives or server memory or SSD&#8217;s.As for me Kingston hold a special value in my life as my first machine(a humble Celeron D with Asrock board) has 2X512MB of Kingston DDR memory.<br />
Now,keeping nostalgia aside,lets see what we on the test bench today.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="logo" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/kingston-ram-review/hyperx_logo.jpg" alt="" width="323" height="143" /></p>
<p>Presenting Kingston Hyper X Blu 1600Mhz 8GB kit (P/N:<a href="http://www.kingston.com/datasheets/KHX1600C9D3B1K2_8GX.pdf" target="_blank">KHX1600C9D3B1K2/8GX</a> ).<br />
The kit is stated as &#8220;Extreme Gaming Memory for Overclocking and Gaming Enthusiasts&#8221;,lets see how extreme it is..shall we?</p>
<p>First up a screenshot of the SPD at stock.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="SPD" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/kingston-ram-review/spd.jpg" alt="" width="413" height="402" /><br />
As we can see the kit is XMP ready.So with an Intel system setting up wont be a problem.<br />
Please continue to next page for more.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/kingston-hyperx-blu-pc3-12800-1600mhz-8gb-kit-review/">Kingston HyperX blu PC3-12800 (1600MHz) 8GB Kit review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/kingston-hyperx-blu-pc3-12800-1600mhz-8gb-kit-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">665</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GSKILL RipjawsX 4GB DDR3 1600Mhz CL9 Review</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-cl9-review/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-cl9-review/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umang Gajera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello again folks , today we are gonna review Gskill&#8217;s RipJawsX 1600Mhz CL9 DDR3 4GBx1 RAM. From quite some time now Gskill has proved itself as one of the best Brands when it comes to Overclocking , Performance and Price. This RAM best fits the low to mid-end systems and is one of the best [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-cl9-review/">GSKILL RipjawsX 4GB DDR3 1600Mhz CL9 Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again folks , today we are gonna review Gskill&#8217;s RipJawsX 1600Mhz CL9 DDR3 4GBx1 RAM. From quite some time now Gskill has proved itself as one of the best Brands when it comes to Overclocking , Performance and Price. This RAM best fits the low to mid-end systems and is one of the best choice if you are planning for a budget Gaming RIG. You can literally overclock this RAM to its limits given you know what you are doing! Now lets have a look at the RAM itself :</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/1.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/1.jpg" ></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/2.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/2.jpg" ></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/3.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/3.jpg" ></a></p>
<p>This RAM doesn&#8217;t have flashy heat spreader but is indeed a decent looking one.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/4.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/4.jpg" ></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/5.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/5.jpg" ></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/6.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/s/6.jpg" ></a></p>
<h4>Overclocking &#038; Results</h4>
<p>The Rig that we used for Benching was :</p>
<p><center></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>CPU</td>
<td>AthlonII X2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RAM</td>
<td>Gskill RipjawsX DDR3 4GB 1600Mhz CL9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Motherboard</td>
<td>Gigabyte 880GM-USB3L</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PSU</td>
<td>Cosair CX430W</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<p>The stock or defaults values for the RAM are as follows :</p>
<p><center></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Frequency</td>
<td>1600Mhz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Memory Size</td>
<td>4GBx1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timings</td>
<td>9-9-9-24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Voltage</td>
<td>1.5 Volts</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<p>Following are the different overclock Settings / Profiles used for Benchmarking:<br />
<center></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Component</td>
<td>Stock Settings</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue"><strong>OC1 Settings</strong></td>
<td class="ocf_darkred"><strong>OC2 Settings</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AMD AthlonII X2</td>
<td>3.2Ghz @ 1.4V</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">4.08Ghz @ 1.52V </td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">4.18Ghz @ 1.52V</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GSkill Ripjaws DDR3</td>
<td>1600Mhz CL9</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">1700Mhz CL11 @1.5v</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">1920Mhz CL11 @1.6v</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>880GM Northbridge</td>
<td>2000Mhz</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">2340Mhz</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">2600Mhz</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<h4>Graphs for Benchmarking Results</h4>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/mm.jpg" /></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/a.jpg" /></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb/ss.jpg" /></p>
<h4>Results in Details</h4>
<p><center></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Benchmark</td>
<td>Stock</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue"><strong>OC1</strong></td>
<td class="ocf_darkred"><strong>OC2</strong></td>
<td>Units</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MaxxMEM &#8211; Mem-Copy</td>
<td>8230</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9019</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9934</td>
<td>MB/s</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MaxxMEM &#8211; Mem-Read</td>
<td>8030</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9839</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">10546</td>
<td>MB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MaxxMEM &#8211; Mem-Write</td>
<td>5768</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">8804</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9080</td>
<td>MB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MaxxMEM &#8211; Mem-Latency</td>
<td>57.4</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">52.4</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">49.0</td>
<td>ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AIDA64 Mem-Read</td>
<td>7950</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9758</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">10601</td>
<td>MB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AIDA64 Mem-Write</td>
<td>5783</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9183</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9433</td>
<td>MB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AIDA64 Mem-Copy</td>
<td>7643</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">8709</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9782</td>
<td>ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AIDA64 Mem-Latency</td>
<td>51.2</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">45.4</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">43.3</td>
<td>ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sandra Mem-performance</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9.9</td>
<td>GB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sandra Interger iSSE2 Mem-BW</td>
<td>7.28</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">9.88</td>
<td>GB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sandra Float iSSE2 Mem-BW</td>
<td>7.31</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">9</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">10</td>
<td>GB/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SuperPI 1M (mod1.5 XS)</td>
<td>24.539</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">19.828</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">19.063</td>
<td>Secs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>wPrime 32M</td>
<td>49.03</td>
<td class="ocf_darkblue">38.421</td>
<td class="ocf_darkred">37.361</td>
<td>Secs</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<h4>Conclusion</h4>
<p>As seen from the results Overclocking this RAM is very easy. In my case I reached 1920-1940 Mhz @ 11-11-11-28-38 @2T on 1.6 Volts. From this its quite obvious that the RAM can go past 2000Mhz with more relaxed timings i.e at CL12 and on 1.7Volts if required. I tried loosen the timings as much as I could and set memory Voltage to 1.7Volts on Gigabyte 880GM-USB3L; but the motherboard won&#8217;t accept it and would reset the CPU clock and RAM multiplier to default. This doesn&#8217;t mean that the RAM is not capable of reaching 2000Mhz+ since I am pretty sure that the motherboard was limiting the MAX Overclock and not the RAM. On a side not : Specs for Gigabyte 880GM-USB3L says it supports &#8220;1666+ Mhz&#8221; Ram so it was pretty good getting 1920-1940Mhz stable on this motherboard.</p>
<p>I would recommend this RAM for low to mid-end PC builds while there are better alternatives from Gskill and Corsair for Beefy RIG Builds. The price to performance of this RAM is rock solid! </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-cl9-review/">GSKILL RipjawsX 4GB DDR3 1600Mhz CL9 Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gskill-ripjawsx-4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-cl9-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">265</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>RAM Overclocking Guide / Tutorial</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/ram-overclocking-guide-tutorial/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/ram-overclocking-guide-tutorial/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umang Gajera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides & Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=30</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Guide on Overclocking DDR1 , DDR2 and DDR3 Rams.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/ram-overclocking-guide-tutorial/">RAM Overclocking Guide / Tutorial</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="Ram" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/ram.jpg" alt="" width="461" height="249" /><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> SECTION 1 : </span></span><br />
When it comes to RAM OCing we mainly concerned with :</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>RAM Clock Frequencies ,</strong></li>
<li><strong>RAM Timings/Latencies ,</strong></li>
<li><strong>FSB : DRAM ratio ,</strong></li>
<li><strong>SPD Chip ,</strong></li>
<li><strong>and Voltage.</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>DDR(1/2/3) RAM modules have 3 types of ‘clocks’ associated with them:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>The first is DRAM Core clock or memory Clock. </strong></li>
<li><strong>The second comes I/O Bus clock. </strong></li>
<li><strong>Finally the 3rd is the Effective Data Rate.</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>The prime difference between DDR1 and DDR2 is that DDR2 can run its I/O bus clock twice the memory clock but with higher latencies and DDR2 has prefetch size of 4 bits as opposed to DDR1’s 2 bits. And the the main difference between DDR2 and DDR3 is that DDR3 can run its I/O bus clock at four times the memory clock but with higher latencies and DDR3’s prefetch buffer is 8 bits deep. </p>
<p><strong><em>For DDR2 :</em></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> I/O Bus Clock = DRAM Core Clock x 2 </strong></span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> Data Rate = I/O Bus Clock x 2 (i.e ‘DDR’) </strong></span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> Data Rate = 4(bits per clock) x I/O Bus Rate [4n prefetch]</strong></span></li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>For DDR3 &#038; DDR4 :</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> I/O Bus Clock = DRAM Core Clock x 4 </strong></span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> Data Rate = I/O Bus Clock x 2 (i.e ‘DDR’)</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff3300;"><strong> Data Rate = 8(bits per clock) x I/O Bus Rate [8n prefetch]</strong></span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Here Onwards, Whenever I Refer ‘Base Memory Clock’ or ‘I/O Bus Clock’ Or ‘DRAM Frequency’ ALL MEAN THE SAME.</strong></p>
<p><strong>For DDR(1\2\3\4)-SD-RAM the data rate is twice the base clock rate.</strong></p>
<p>For e.g. RAM running at <strong>DRAM Frequency (Base Memory Clock) of 400 Mhz</strong> has an <strong>effective (data rate) Frequency of 800 Mhz i.e. effective signalling rate of 800 MT/s [MegaTransfers per Second]</strong>.</p>
<div class="highlight">
<p><strong>Limits for DDR2, DDR3 &#038; DDR4 :</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>For <strong><em>DDR2 RAM</em></strong> modules the official max frequency is <strong><span style="color: #0087bd;">800 Mhz</span> (Jedec)</strong> while it can reach to <strong>1200 Mhz</strong> when overclocked.</li>
<li>For <strong><em>DDR3 RAM</em></strong> modules the official max frequency is <strong><span style="color:#0087bd;">1600 Mhz</span> (Jedec)</strong> but can reach <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>2500Mhz+</strong></span> with better ICs when overclocked </li>
<li>For <strong><em>DDR4 RAM</em></strong> modules the official max frequency is <strong><span style="color: #0087bd;">3200 Mhz</span> (Jedec)</strong> but now we have module that can go past <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>4000 Mhz</strong></span>  with binned ICs.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>Before going further into details I’d like you to have a look on the screen shot that I have taken on my PC for explanation so that you can understand better; that’s what I hope!</p>
<p><strong>Screenshot 1: Showing the SPD chip readings and memory details. </strong></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/guide_tutorial/ram_overclocking/ram_spd.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>Screenshot 2: Showing the ‘current’ RAM timings , frequency and FSB : RAM ratio.</strong></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/guide_tutorial/ram_overclocking/ram_settings.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">SECTION 2 : Ram Timings </span></span></p>
<p>When it comes to Overclocking RAM we are just concerned with <strong>4</strong>(out of many) primary timings as seen in <strong>screenshot 2</strong>. The chips used on the DDR ram modules have different types of timings(Primary &#038; Secondary) which give us a sense of the speed of ram along with its stability and rated frequency of-course. When it comes to overclocking <strong>loosening(increasing)</strong> the timings is very effective for increasing the RAM frequency making the modules stable at high frequencies and on the contrary reducing the RAM frequency the timings can be <strong>tightened (lowered)</strong>. But ironically lowering the timings decreases access time but at the cost of the bandwidth.</p>
<p><em>Now lets get a feel of some of the<strong> Signals(strobes)</strong> for RAM:</em></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>/CAS[Active low]</strong> : Column access strobe(signal) When this signal goes low , the column in the selected row is ready to be accessed in burst mode of 2 , 4 or 8.</li>
<li><strong>/RAS[Active low]</strong> : Row access strobe(signal)</li>
<li><strong>Precharge</strong> : Used to activate/deactivate a row in the selected bank before it can be used for read/write operation.</li>
</ol>
<p>These timings are specified are in the following order : <strong>tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS</strong> and as you have guessed <strong>‘t’</strong> stands for time. <strong></strong></p>
<div class="special sp_blue notestar"> <strong>NOTE:</strong> All latencies are in terms of clock cycles and actually derived from the current bus speed which is in nanoseconds.For e.g. CAS latency(which is explained below) in nano seconds from clock cycles can be found as follows:<br />
<span style="font-size:15px;" class="aligncenter"><strong>CAS Latency in ns = CAS delay in cycles x time taken for 1 cycle</strong></span><br />
But time period is inverse of frequency; Hence we get,<br />
<span style="font-size:15px;"><strong> CAS Latency in ns = CAS Latency in cycles x [Bus Frequency] <sup> –1</sup></strong></span><br />
Finally,<br />
<span style="font-size:15px;"><strong>CAS LAtency in ns = CAS Latency in cycle / Bus Frequency</strong></span>
</div>
<p>The 4 important timings with respect to RAM Overclocking are :</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>t-CL [CAS Latency]<em> : It is time elapsed between the memory controller sending the address of the column and the data that &#8220;first&#8221; arrives in response</em>. </strong>Since data is sequentially placed in memory and a row contains sequential data so its quite simple to catch the fact that columns will be switched more frequently than rows so CAS will have a big impact on performance. Though some say that CL is not that important, but generally it is and its only in the case of bizarre memory access patterns that CL may become less significant.
<div class="highlight">
<strong>Typical t-CL Values in clock cycles :</strong></p>
<ul style="margin-bottom:0px">
<li>DDR1 &#8211; 2,3</li>
<li>DDR2 &#8211; 4 to 6</li>
<li>DDR3 &#8211; 6 to 10</li>
<li>DDR4 &#8211; 10 to 18</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</li>
<li><strong>t-RCD [RAS to CAS Delay]</strong> : <strong><em>It is the amount of delay between a RAS and a CAS.</em></strong>=or= Simply speaking it is the time taken to select a particular row first and then selecting the particular column for data access. It doesn’t have a huge impact on performance.
<div class="highlight">
<strong>Typical t-RCD Values in clock cycles :</strong></p>
<ul style="margin-bottom:0px">
<li>DDR1 &#8211; 2 to 4</li>
<li>DDR2 &#8211; 3 to 5</li>
<li>DDR3 &#8211; 6 to 10</li>
<li>DDR4 &#8211; 10 to 18</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</li>
<li><strong>t-RP [RAS Precharge Time]</strong> : <strong><em>It is the time required to deactivate the current row and activate next row.</em></strong><br />
=or=<br />
Simply delay caused by switching between rows.</p>
<div class="highlight">
<strong>Typical t-RP Values in clock cycles :</strong></p>
<ul style="margin-bottom:0px">
<li>DDR1 &#8211; 2 to 4</li>
<li>DDR2 &#8211; 3 to 5</li>
<li>DDR3 &#8211; 6 to 10</li>
<li>DDR4 &#8211; 10 to 18</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</li>
<li><strong>t-RAS [Active to Precharge Delay / Row Active Time]</strong> : <strong><em>Time required between an active and a precharge command.</em></strong><br />
=or=<br />
The time taken between 2 memory access / Data requests.<br />
=or=<br />
The time taken to activate a memory bank(row) and then deactivating it. It affects stability more than performance. It is approximately equal to <strong>tCL + rRCD + tRP [=&gt;tRAS]</strong> while in some cases it may not be so. And here&#8217;s a quote from a wiki article : </p>
<blockquote><p> <strong><em>“in practice for DDR RAM Modules , it should be set to at least tRCD + tCAS + 2 to allow enough time for data to get streamed out”</em></strong></p></blockquote>
<div class="highlight">
<strong>Typical t-RAS values in cycles :</strong></p>
<ul style="margin-bottom:0px">
<li>DDR1 &#8211; 5 to 12</li>
<li>DDR2 &#8211; 10 to 19</li>
<li>DDR3 &#8211; 15 to 30</li>
<li>DDR4 &#8211; 20 to 36</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<h2 class="shead">SECTION 3A : FSB:DRAM Ratio on Legacy Systems </h2>
<p>In case of legacy systems where the memory controller was present on the northbridge, while talking about FSB : DRAM ratio we are concerned with the base FSB frequency and the DRAM frequency (base clock rate).This ratio tells us <strong>“who is running faster than whom” </strong>and when DRAM frequency is more than base FSB or both are the same then we won’t have any issues with system performance. Depending on both the frequencies, FSB : DRAM ratio can yield any one of the 2 operating modes which are Synchronous and Asynchronous. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Synchronous Mode: (sync)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>In sync mode both the frequencies are equal which means that both the RAM and FSB are running synchronously and yields max performance.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Asynchronous Mode: (async)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Note that Async mode can give either max performance or average performance as follows:
<ul>
<li>If the FSB frequency is more than DRAM frequency then u’ll get average or poor performance because FSB(hence CPU) is running faster than RAM and so RAM cannot cope with data hungry CPU’s requests and eventually CPU has wait i.e be in a idle state for a while till the data arrives from RAM.</li>
<li>If the DRAM frequency is more or equal to FSB clock speed then u’ll get max performance since here CPU doesn’t have be idle in between and also DRAM being faster than FSB is not a concern since CPU will read/write data at FSB’s rate.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Common FSB ratios :</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>3:4 -&gt; For each 4 DRAM ticks , FSB ticks at rate of 3 </strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>2:3 -&gt; FSB is at 266 Mhz and DRAM is at 400 Mhz</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>1:1 -&gt; Both are equal for e.g both running …at say 266 Mhz</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>5:4 -&gt; You can guess this!</strong></em></li>
</ul>
<h2 class="shead">SECTION 3B : FSB:DRAM Ratio on current Systems </h2>
<p>On Current systems be it Intel or AMD where the Memory controller is integrated completely inside the CPU die, the significance of FSB:DRAM ratio has changed. What we used to call FSB is now QPI(Quick path interconnect) on Intel systems and for AMD systems we call it HyperTransport(HT). Now its just a ratio of Base Clock (BCLK) to Memory Clock. </p>
<div class="special sp_blue noteinfo"> AMD was the first one to move Memory Controller inside the CPU using Hyper Transport(HT). Years later Intel followed when finally Memory Controller was integrated with CPU, with the release of their Nehalem architecture. </div>
<h2 class="shead">SECTION 4 : Ram Voltages </h2>
<p>This is the last thing you wanna mess with , after it being configured according to the EPP or XMP profile. Generally voltage increase must be limited to <strong>8% to 10%</strong> of the max supported voltage according to EPP or XMP Profile and you must make sure that the chips on the RAM modues supports this level of voltage increment else you will end up damaging it. For DDR2 for Mobos which support Core2 architecture <strong>2.1/2.2/2.3 V is safest maximum</strong> but this doesn’t mean all RAMs have this as their max safe limit. The safest max voltage depends on the chips used by the manufacturer. For <strong>DDR2</strong> generally the default is <strong>1.8V</strong> while for <strong>DDR3</strong> its <strong>1.5V</strong> . It again majorly depends on the chips used for the modules. But i’d say <strong>never-ever do this</strong> until you have enough experience and know about various chips. Instead set the RAM’s voltage according to EPP/XMP profile if not set.</p>
<p>Standard JEDEC &amp; Oveclocked Voltages :</p>
<ul>
<li>For <strong>DDR1 &#8211; Jedec = <span style="color: #00cc00;">2.5V</span> | OC = <span style="color: #ff0033;">3.2v Max</span> </strong></li>
<li>For <strong>DDR2 &#8211; Jedec = <span style="color: #00cc00;">1.8V</span> | OC = <span style="color: #ff0033;">2.3V Max</span> , <span style="color: #ff9900;">1.8V~2.2V</span> is ‘just safe’ for 24/7</strong></li>
<li>For <strong>DDR3 &#8211; Jedec = <span style="color: #00cc00;">1.5V</span> | OC = <span style="color: #ff0033;">2.1V Max</span> , <span style="color: #ff9900;">1.5~2.0V</span> is ‘just safe’for 24/7 while on some systems <span style="color: #ff0033;">1.65V+</span> may be fatal (old corei7 LGA1366 systems). </strong></li>
<li>For <strong>DDR4 &#8211; Jedec = <span style="color: #00cc00;">1.2V</span> | OC = <span style="color: #ff0033;">1.35v-1.40v Max</span> , <span style="color: #ff9900;">1.2~1.35V</span> is ‘just safe’for 24/7 while it seems that going over<span style="color: #ff0033;">1.5V</span> might be serious risky stuff. </strong></li>
</ul>
<h2 class="shead">SECTION 5 : A Word On SPD &#038; XMP/EPP Profiles</h2>
<p>SPD is the acronym for <em><strong>Serial Presence Detect</strong></em>. SPD chips are now commonly found on the SDRAM DIMM Modules. Its job is to store the RAM settings for different frequency and voltages. SPD makes it easier for bios to configure RAM for the system. Apart from the <strong>JEDEC</strong> standard profiles SPD also contains <strong>EPP or XMP profiles</strong>. <strong><em>EPP is Enhanced Performance Profile</em></strong> which can be read by some Nvidia and AMD chipsets and configures the RAM according to it. If not supported then BIOS just loads the default configuration. EPP is present on RAM modules which are marketed as <strong>“SLI ready”</strong> or <strong>“Crossfire ready”</strong> which is just a marketing thing then any thing else. If the Motherboard cannot read EPP it does not mean that the RAM cannot be configured as per the EPP. In this case we just have to configure it <strong>manually</strong>. XMP is Intel’s substitute for <strong><em>EPP which is short for eXtreme Memory Profile</em></strong>. </p>
<p>The use of EPP/XMP is just to get the RAM configured for max performance at its rate specifications which are often beyond the standard Jedec specs for Overclocking grade RAMs. When you first install High-speed memory sticks, they will run at &#8216;default&#8217; Jedec speeds. To configure your RAM sticks at the rated speed you will have enter BIOS and apply the XMP profile. This setting is usually present under the Overclocking/Tweaking section of your BIOS. Many RAM sticks have multiple XMP profiles; so just choose the best one available, which will provide a baseline setting for overclocking. <strong>Screenshot-1 shows</strong> <em>SPD profiles</em> of my RAM.</p>
<p>Here is my BIOS screenshot showing XMP profiles available to select from:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/guide_tutorial/ram_overclocking/xmp_profiles_bios.jpg" alt="RAM XMP Profiles as shown in BIOS" class="aligncenter" width=600px /></p>
<h2 class="shead">SECTION 6 : How do we do it? </h2>
<p>After getting equipped with the knowledge presented above its time to do some RAM Overclocking which is straight forward.</p>
<p>I like to do it in 2 cycle fashion:<br />
<strong>CYCLE A:</strong> Find your Overclock settings at rated Voltage.<br />
<strong>CYCLE B:</strong> Find your max Overclock at bumped up Voltages past your Overclock at rated Voltages.</p>
<p>The following Steps Integrate both these Cycles:</p>
<ul>
<strong>Pre-requisite</strong> : If applicable, First apply the XMP/EPP profile for your RAM from BIOS.</p>
<li><strong>1)</strong> Now, Increase the frequency to next available increment from the list. This setting is usually called &#8220;DRAM frequency&#8221;. On Some systems it may be called &#8220;Memory multiplier&#8221; where you will need to select the next multiplier value in the list. You can fine tune the values of these increments by changing the FSB or BaseClock as mentioned in STEP 8.<br />
<img decoding="async" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/guide_tutorial/ram_overclocking/ram_freq_increments_bios.jpg" alt="RAM frequency increments as shown in BIOS" class="aligncenter" width=600px />
</li>
<li><strong>2)</strong> If the system is stable then, run all the necessary <strong>stability tests</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>3)</strong> If tests are successful repeat <strong>step 1</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>4)</strong> If tests fail i.e. system crashes(unstable) during testing then <strong>loosen(increase) the timings</strong>. You can increase the 4 timings mentioned above by 1-1-1-2 or 1-1-1-3 receptively and repeat until you get stability.<br />
<img decoding="async" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/guide_tutorial/ram_overclocking/ram_timings_bios.jpg" alt="RAM timings as shown in BIOS" class="aligncenter" width=600px />
</li>
<li><strong>5)</strong> Now start again from <strong>step 2</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>5.1)</strong> Some where here you must get a <strong>stable overclock</strong>. Now if you want you can repeat the process again from Step 1.</li>
<li><strong>6)</strong> If you want to Overclock memory further and/or if system crashes after <strong>step 5</strong> its time to increase voltage &#8211; AT YOUR OWN RISK!</li>
<li><strong>7)</strong> Increment DRAM voltage in steps of <strong>0.05v or 0.02v</strong> depending on your memory module [BEWARE].</li>
<li><strong>7.1)</strong> If system is unstable or if sometimes you get: &#8220;Overclocking failed&#8221; in BIOS during boot then, it may be time to increase IO voltage. This is essentially the memory controller voltage. On Current systems(CPU with IMC) its generally called VCCIO in most BIOSes. On Legacy systems its the Northbridge Voltage or NB Voltage. Initially try with 1% to 2% bumps. Consult the Motherboard manual and/or CPU datasheet for absolute max IO Voltage. Its better to ask experienced fellow Overclockers who own the same(nearly) system as your. </li>
<li><strong>7.2)</strong> You can stop after <strong>step 7</strong> or proceed further for some more insanity.</li>
<li><strong>8)</strong> You can adjust your FSB or Base Clock(BCLK) and repeat from <strong>step 2 =or= step 1</strong> for memory frequency fine tuning. On some systems (before Skylake) the Base Clock is tied to PCIE &#038; DMI, hence you don&#8217;t have much headroom to overclock your Base Clock(BLCK). If not obvious, please note that increasing your base clock will also increase your CPU speed.</li>
<li><strong>9)</strong><strong> After this you would have pushed your RAM to its limits and a little more OCing would seriously damage your RAM or even worse your CPU with integrated memory controller.</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>RAM stability test and other Utilities:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.memtest86.com/" target="_blank">http://www.memtest86.com/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://hcidesign.com/memtest/" target="_blank">http://hcidesign.com/memtest/</a></li>
<li>Prime95 &#8211; for CPU Benchmarking &#038; stability test | Link : <a href="http://mersenne.org/" target="_blank">http://mersenne.org</a></li>
<li>CPUZ &#8211; Gives you all your hardware info | Link : <a href="http://cpuid.org/" target="_blank">http://cpuid.org</a></li>
</ul>
<div class="special sp_red notewarning"><strong>Disclaimer </strong>: Though Overclocking is considerably safe these days &#8230; but fiddling around with Voltages.. be it CPU , Mobo or RAM is still a bit dangerous and can induce fatal damage in your hardware or even worse can render it useless. I will not take any responsibility if you damage your system after overclocking. PLAY SAFE Do not Bother Voltage increments!</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/ram-overclocking-guide-tutorial/">RAM Overclocking Guide / Tutorial</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/ram-overclocking-guide-tutorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">30</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.ocfreaks.com @ 2026-03-05 04:16:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->