<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nvidia - OCFreaks!</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/tag/nvidia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/tag/nvidia/</link>
	<description>Overclocking , Gaming , Technology , Robotics &#38; DIY!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 20:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.4</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">42777727</site>	<item>
		<title>ASUS India announces Matrix R9 290X and GTX 780 Ti Graphics Cards.</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-india-announces-matrix-r9-290x-and-gtx-780-ti-graphics-cards/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-india-announces-matrix-r9-290x-and-gtx-780-ti-graphics-cards/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=2116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Asus just released some information about the availability and specifications of the new Matrix R9 290X and GTX 780 Ti GPU's.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-india-announces-matrix-r9-290x-and-gtx-780-ti-graphics-cards/">ASUS India announces Matrix R9 290X and GTX 780 Ti Graphics Cards.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/misc/MATRIX_R9290X.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class=" aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/misc/MATRIX_R9290X.jpg" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Asus just released some information about the availability and specifications of the new Matrix R9 290X and GTX 780 Ti GPU&#8217;s.</p>
<table width="&quot;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="2" valign="top" width="309"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">SPECIFICATIONS</span></b><b> </b><b></b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="309"><b>ROG Matrix R9 290X</b><b> </b></td>
<td valign="top" width="309"><b>ROG Matrix GTX 780 Ti</b><b></b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="309">
<ul>
<li>AMD Radeon™ R9 290X</li>
<li>PCI Express® 3.0</li>
<li>OpenGL® 4.4</li>
<li>4096MB (4GB) GDDR5 memory</li>
<li>1050MHz engine clock speed</li>
<li>5400MHz (1350MHz GDDR5) memory clock</li>
<li>512-bit memory interface</li>
<li>4096 x 2160 maximum resolution</li>
<li>2 x DVI-D output</li>
<li>1 x HDMI output</li>
<li>1 x DisplayPort output</li>
<li>HDCP-compliant</li>
<li>ASUS GPU Tweak and drivers included</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top" width="309">
<ul>
<li>NIVIDA® GeForce® GTX 780 Ti</li>
<li>PCI Express® 3.0</li>
<li>OpenGL® 4.4</li>
<li>3072MB (3GB) GDDR5 memory</li>
<li>1072MHz boost clock</li>
<li>7000MHz  memory clock</li>
<li>384-bit memory interface</li>
<li>4096 x 2160 maximum resolution</li>
<li>1 x DVI-D output</li>
<li>1 x DVI-I output</li>
<li>1 x HDMI output</li>
<li>1 x DisplayPort output</li>
<li>HDCP-compliant</li>
<li>ASUS GPU Tweak and drivers included</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Both the cards come loaded with Asus standard fare stuff on both hardware and software side like the DIGI+ 14 phase VRM,single push bios change,LN2 jumper and Asus GPU tweak.</p>
<p>Prices are stated at 54K for the 290x and 60K for the 780Ti for now.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/misc/MATRIX_GTX780TI.jpg" width="500" height="475" /></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-india-announces-matrix-r9-290x-and-gtx-780-ti-graphics-cards/">ASUS India announces Matrix R9 290X and GTX 780 Ti Graphics Cards.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-india-announces-matrix-r9-290x-and-gtx-780-ti-graphics-cards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2116</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumor:GTX Titan about to get a refresh?</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/rumorgtx-titan-about-to-get-a-refresh/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/rumorgtx-titan-about-to-get-a-refresh/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=1853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>With the release of GTX 780Ti, GTX TITAN is not the biggest card anymore. With its substantially higher clock speed 780Ti constantly outperforms the Titan. Also with no decrease on its MRP the Titan is utter ridiculous these days. However,if the rumors are true then we might see a refresh in the future. A certain [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/rumorgtx-titan-about-to-get-a-refresh/">Rumor:GTX Titan about to get a refresh?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the release of GTX 780Ti, GTX TITAN is not the biggest card anymore. With its substantially higher clock speed 780Ti constantly outperforms the Titan. Also with no decrease on its MRP the Titan is utter ridiculous these days.</p>
<p>However,if the rumors are true then we might see a refresh in the future.</p>
<p>A certain user on Chinese forums have released a few pictures of a Refreshed GTX Titan with a black Cooler. We might see a fully unlocked GK110 with all the 15 SMX clusters unlocked with a bit of tweaked core speed and 6GB of memory. Nothing else will make sense given the point that NVIDIA would keep the MRP as before or more.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/random/titan_black_1.jpg" width="580" height="326" /></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/random/titan_black_2.jpg" width="580" height="543" /></p>
<p>What do you guys think? Photoshop or True?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Let us know in the comments below.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://videocardz.com/48149/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-black-edition-pictured" target="_blank">VideoCardz</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/rumorgtx-titan-about-to-get-a-refresh/">Rumor:GTX Titan about to get a refresh?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/rumorgtx-titan-about-to-get-a-refresh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1853</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA’s GTX 780 Ti Speeds &#038; Specs Leaked</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidias-gtx-780-ti-speeds-specs-leaked/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidias-gtx-780-ti-speeds-specs-leaked/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=1719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AMD&#8217;s been headlining about their Titan killer r9 290X for a the past few weeks.In an weird turn of event Nvidia announced a few new things of their own including a new &#8220;flagship&#8221;card : GTX 780 Ti. in essence its the same GTX 780 with a few tweaked specs. So far nothing was revealed by [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidias-gtx-780-ti-speeds-specs-leaked/">NVIDIA’s GTX 780 Ti Speeds &#038; Specs Leaked</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/misc/geforce-gtx-780-ti-reveal.jpg" width="600" height="400" /></p>
<p>AMD&#8217;s been headlining about their Titan killer r9 290X for a the past few weeks.In an weird turn of event Nvidia announced a few new things of their own including a new &#8220;flagship&#8221;card : GTX 780 Ti.<br />
in essence its the same GTX 780 with a few tweaked specs. So far nothing was revealed by nvidia about the specifications but one user from <a href="http://www.chiphell.com/thread-880923-1-1.html" target="_blank">chiphell</a> has manged to publish one gpu-z screenshot of the card.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/misc/780ti_spec.jpg" width="403" height="495" /></p>
<p>we can see its the same GK 110 core used in the Titan and the GTX 780. The main difference with GTX 780 lies in the fact that where 780 has 2304 Stream processors the 780ti has 2496 stream processors and 204 texture units(TU&#8217;s) in place of 780&#8217;s 192 TU&#8217;s.<br />
Other than that we see an increase in core clock (902 MHz in 780Ti vs 863 MHz in 780) and boost clock(954 MHz in 780Ti vs 900 MHz in 780).<br />
Other than this everything seems all same.<br />
with an expected price tag of $650 its clear that Nvidia wants this one to compete with the r9 290x from AMD.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidias-gtx-780-ti-speeds-specs-leaked/">NVIDIA’s GTX 780 Ti Speeds &#038; Specs Leaked</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidias-gtx-780-ti-speeds-specs-leaked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1719</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC review</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-geforce-gtx-780-directcu-ii-oc/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-geforce-gtx-780-directcu-ii-oc/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 07:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=1575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Nvidia's Flagship gaming card...tested.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-geforce-gtx-780-directcu-ii-oc/">Asus GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction-->The graphics arena is very dynamic now a days, with the acquirement of ATI in 2006 by AMD its been a constant battle between the Greens and the Reds with both side having their share of the crown. For the last two progressions however we can see both side trumping respectively. With implementation of TSMC 28Nm node the innovation have died down a bit and we are seeing an annual refresh of lineup from both sides. While AMD has kept the best of both worlds in their lineup, Nvidia has fully segregated their lineup with Geforce denoting the gaming segment and Quadro denoting the professional segment. Today we have the flagship Nvidia gaming GPU with us for review.</p>
<p>Presenting the <strong>Asus GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC</strong></p>
<p>While the 780 in itself is a bit of downer for me(expected more and got less), the card we have is a piece of engineering.<br />
ASUS as always tried to out do themsleves&#8230;and they did.<br />
How they did is what we will see in the review</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/asus-gtx-780-dcu-2/Frontpage.png" width="674" height="208" /></p>
<p>Over the next few pages we would go through a quick look at the features and specs,a little showcase and then dive into numbers&#8230;aight?</p>
<p>next page please.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-geforce-gtx-780-directcu-ii-oc/">Asus GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-geforce-gtx-780-directcu-ii-oc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1575</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia releases 331.40 beta driver for Battlefield 4 beta</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-releases-beta-driver-for-battlefield-4-beta/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-releases-beta-driver-for-battlefield-4-beta/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=1620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Not wanting to stay behind Nvidia released a beta driver just ahead of  BF4 exclusive beta launch. Main features includes Battlefield 4 beta support. Horizon Based Ambient Occlusion plus (HBAO+) implementation. Download link for 331.40 Windows Vista/7/8/8.1 x32 Windows Vista/7/8/8.1 x64 Windows XP 32bit Windows XP 64bit Do let us how much performance you are getting [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-releases-beta-driver-for-battlefield-4-beta/">Nvidia releases 331.40 beta driver for Battlefield 4 beta</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/misc/geforce-logo.png" width="614" height="138" /></p>
<p>Not wanting to stay behind Nvidia released a beta driver just ahead of  BF4 exclusive beta launch.<br />
Main features includes</p>
<ul>
<li>Battlefield 4 beta support.</li>
<li>Horizon Based Ambient Occlusion plus (HBAO+) implementation.</li>
</ul>
<p>Download link for 331.40</p>
<div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.guru3d.com/files_get/geforce_331_40_beta_driver_download,1.html">Windows Vista/7/8/8.1 x32</a>
<div></div>
</li>
<li><a href="http://www.guru3d.com/files_get/geforce_331_40_beta_driver_download,2.html">Windows Vista/7/8/8.1 x64</a>
<div></div>
</li>
<li><a href="http://www.guru3d.com/files_get/geforce_331_40_beta_driver_download,3.html">Windows XP 32bit</a>
<div></div>
</li>
<li><a href="http://www.guru3d.com/files_get/geforce_331_40_beta_driver_download,4.html">Windows XP 64bit</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Do let us how much performance you are getting in game!</p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-releases-beta-driver-for-battlefield-4-beta/">Nvidia releases 331.40 beta driver for Battlefield 4 beta</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-releases-beta-driver-for-battlefield-4-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1620</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Know your GPU</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/know-your-gpu/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suryasis Mondal ( Aka: Cilus )]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides & Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=743</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An extensive writeup on Gpu's..</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/know-your-gpu/">Know your GPU</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:War on GPU's--><br />
<span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">War on GPU&#8217;s</span></span></p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/know-gpu/header.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="headers" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/know-gpu/header.jpg" width="425" height="203" /></a></p>
<h4>Graphics Cards :</h4>
<p>The choice of this component is actually the most tricky and we see more discussions about this higher than anything else in the communities. Better FPS or smoothness, Compute Performance or raw  performance, single GPU or multi GPU setup you name it and we will find war like situations over it.. In my articles I will try to give you a brief overview of some very important features and concepts regarding graphics processing in general and in turn Graphics Cards.</p>
<p>Please read on to know more..</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/know-your-gpu/">Know your GPU</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">743</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus GTX 660Ti Direct CU II TOP review</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-gtx-660ti-direct-cu-ii-top-review/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-gtx-660ti-direct-cu-ii-top-review/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week we've reviewed ASUS 660Ti Direct CU II TOP Graphics card...the new card on the block.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-gtx-660ti-direct-cu-ii-top-review/">Asus GTX 660Ti Direct CU II TOP review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction--><br />
<span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> Introduction </span></span><br />
So i was thinking about doing a review on my HD7850 but i guess the hardware gods have something else in their mind.So,one fine day i find a nice big parcel in my doorstep. Presenting the GTX 660Ti :the new card based on GK104 chip from Nvidia.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/asus-660ti-dcu-2/fp.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="dcuii TOP" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/asus-660ti-dcu-2/s/fp.jpg" width="400" height="63" /></a></p>
<p>Now, before i dive into benchmarks and stuff let’s have a look at the thing we have in hand. The card we would be reviewing is the Direct CU II TOP version from Asus; currently the most aggressively binned card in the market.</p>
<p>Let’s have a look at the specs to start things off:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Graphics Engine</th>
<td>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Bus Standard</th>
<td>PCI Express 3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Video Memory</th>
<td>GDDR5 2GB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CUDA Core</th>
<td>1344</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Shader Clock</th>
<td>GPU Boost Clock : 1137 MHz<br />
GPU Base Clock : 1059 MHz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Memory Clock</th>
<td>6008 MHz (1502 MHz GDDR5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Memory Interface</th>
<td>192-bit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Resolution</th>
<td>DVI Max Resolution : 2560&#215;1600</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Interface</th>
<td>DVI Output : Yes x 1 (DVI-I), Yes x 1 (DVI-D)<br />
HDMI Output : Yes x 1<br />
Display Port : Yes x 1 (Regular DP)<br />
HDCP Support : Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Dimensions</th>
<td>10.7 &#8221; x 5.4 &#8221; x 1.7 &#8221; Inch</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The main Difference between the reference 660TI and this card is that this card is clocked around 150Mhz higher than the reference version with a better cooler.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-gtx-660ti-direct-cu-ii-top-review/">Asus GTX 660Ti Direct CU II TOP review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-gtx-660ti-direct-cu-ii-top-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">437</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Geforce Fermi GPU Overclocking Guide</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-geforce-fermi-gpu-overclocking-guide/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-geforce-fermi-gpu-overclocking-guide/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaurav Bharadwaj ( Aka : ghost_z )]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides & Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=65</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Introduction The fermi architecture was reavealed by Nvidia way back in 2009 and the first Nvidia GPU series to be based on that architecture was the GTX 4XX series.The first card to be released was the GTX 480,and later on various other cards were released.Then the GTX 5XX series was released not too long ago [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-geforce-fermi-gpu-overclocking-guide/">Nvidia Geforce Fermi GPU Overclocking Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="http://i.imgur.com/Z8vYx.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Introduction</span></span></p>
<p>The fermi architecture was reavealed by Nvidia way back in 2009 and the first Nvidia GPU series to be based on that architecture was the GTX 4XX series.The first card to be released was the GTX 480,and later on various other cards were released.Then the GTX 5XX series was released not too long ago with the first card being the GTX 580.</p>
<p><strong>Major differences Between previous gen GPU&#8217;s like GTX 2XX and the new fermi architecture are as follows :</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Fermi based cards have GDDR5 memory modules with ECC(Error Correction) capabilities while the older architectures had GDDR3 non ECC modules.</li>
<li>Fermi based cards had core clock and shader clock speeds interlocked in the ratio 1:2 while the older architectures need not be so.</li>
<li>Fermi based cards were the first ones to support OpenGL4 and DirectX11 API&#8217;S(Application Programming Interface).</li>
<li>Fermi based cards had tessellation units specifically for its hardware based implementation while the older architectures lacked it.</li>
</ol>
<p>Well there are many more differences but for the sake of simplicity these are the most important ones to be concerned about.</p>
<p><strong>List of GPU&#8217;s based on the Fermi architecture:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Dual GPU : GTX 590</li>
<li>High End : GTX 580,GTX 480,GTX 570,GTX 470</li>
<li>Mid End : GTX 560 TI,GTX 560,GTX 460,GTX 465,GTX 550 TI,GTS 450</li>
<li>Low End : GT 545,GT 440,GT 530,GT 430,GT 520,GT 510</li>
</ol>
<div class="caution"><strong>Disclaimer:</strong> Although i guarantee that the info and method stated here are safe and correct,i will not be held responsible for any ocing adventure gone wrong.</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<p><strong>Setting Up Your System :</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Firstly no BIOS adjustments required for the GPU OC unless you have changed your PCI bus frequency,if yes then change the PCI frequency to default.</li>
<li>Now login to windows and install some essential Softwares/Utilities(Discussed later on in the next section).</li>
<li>Now set all your card Frequencies to default/stock.</li>
</ol>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Softwares/Utilities Required:</span></span></p>
<p><strong>1)</strong> Geforce GPU Drivers&#8211;Do we need an explanation here .</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://www.geforce.com/Drivers" target="_blank">http://www.geforce.com/Drivers</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/xZbRu.png" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>2)</strong> MSI Afterburner&#8211;&#8220;The&#8221; best and &#8220;The&#8221; most user friendly OC&#8217;ing app available on earth.</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://downloads.guru3d.com/MSI-Afterburner-2.2.0-Beta-12-download-2850.html" target="_blank">http://downloads.guru3d.com/MSI-Afte&#8230;load-2850.html</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/Qc495.png" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>3)</strong>Unigine Heaven&#8211;A very good benchmark for DX11 Tessellation enabled GPU&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://unigine.com/products/heaven/download/" target="_blank">http://unigine.com/products/heaven/download/</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/AJwef.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>4)</strong>OCCT&#8211;A gem among stress testing apps,a very versatile GPU testing/stressing Tool.</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://www.ocbase.com/perestroika_en/index.php?Download" target="_blank">http://www.ocbase.com/perestroika_en/index.php?Download</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/GB9Cj.png" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>5)</strong> 3DMark11&#8211;A very Good DX11 GPU/CPU stresser.</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/" target="_blank">http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/SxocQ.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>6)</strong> GPU-Z&#8211;GPU monitoring Tool.</p>
<p>Download&#8211;<a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/SysInfo/GPU-Z/" target="_blank">http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/SysInfo/GPU-Z/</a></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://i.imgur.com/nxv4u.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> Understanding Some Basic Stuff : </span></span></strong></p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>Core Frequency/Clock</strong>: This is the speed at which the graphics core will be working,OC&#8217;ing this entity will yield you highest performance gains when compared to other frequencies.<strong>Shader Frequency/Clock</strong> : This is the speed at the shader algorithms are able to reprogram the graphics pipeline,this is the second most important frequency to be taken into consideration while OC&#8217;ing.</p>
<p><strong>Memory Frequency/Clock</strong> : This is the speed at which the VRAM or the GPU&#8217;s RAM work,this is the least important frequency while OC&#8217;ing as it yields very very less gains in terms of performance.</p>
</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<div class="note">NOTE: I still see many people think of shaders as some hardware units but in reality they are nothing more than algorithms which are used to reprogram the graphics processing pipeline to achieve the desired shading effect.</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> Important Voltages </span></span></p>
<p><strong>GPU VCORE</strong> : Its the amount of volts fed into the GPU&#8217;s core,its the most Important voltage for OC&#8217;ing GPU&#8217;s.</p>
<p><strong>Safe Limit : Stock &#8211; 1.1Volts</strong></p>
<div class="note">NOTE: In some Non Reference PCB based GPU&#8217;s you have 2 additional voltage adjustment options.</div>
<p>Mem Volt-Important for OC&#8217;ing memory.</p>
<p>PLL Volt-Its just a gimmick by the manufacturers ,till now there has been no evidence of the card being able to OC higher and be stable by increasing the PLL Voltage.</p>
<p><strong>Some Basic Rules Before Moving On</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Don&#8217;t set a target in mind,OC&#8217;ing is a recursive process,there is no guarantee you will achieve your desired overclock.</li>
<li>Make sure your GPU temps are within 85C before any overclock @ stock,because if your cards already above 85C at stock,there won&#8217;t be much overclock headroom available to you,it does not mean your card can&#8217;t overclock,but it means that its not too safe to run your GPU at 90-100C 24X7.</li>
<li>Make sure your GPU is dust free as dust will add in to the temps of your GPU.</li>
</ol>
<div class="note">NOTE: Please note that overclocking any component/GPU in your system voids its warranty but there is a great loophole in this which guyz like us can use to RMA our card if its bricked,unless your card is burned or physically damaged there is no way of telling that your card was oced and as a result it went off,so be smart when going to RMA centers just don&#8217;t tell them that you oced,make some sensible excuses,like my card artifacts or it won&#8217;t boot etc etc.</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> Finally Overclocking </span></span></p>
<p><strong>&#8212;&#8211;Without Messing With The Voltages</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>1) After booting into windows start GPU-Z and Afterburner,close any unnecessary applications,verify your cards stock clocks and voltage.Also update your GPU drivers.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>2) Now to start OCing bring afterburner into view and you will see 4 sliders by defaults namely</li>
</ul>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
<ol>
<li>Core Clock</li>
<li>Shader Clock</li>
<li>Memory Clock</li>
<li>Fan Speed</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Here our aim will be to stabilize all the clocks one by one.We start with core clock(core and shader clocks are linked so essentially you will be increasing both automatically if you increase any one of those).</p>
<ul>
<li>3) Start raising the core clock speed 10 MHz at a time(you can also increase more if you are feeling adventurous but increasing in lower steps ensure that you will find more stable and safer highest frequency).After each increment run 2 loops of unigine heaven and 3dmark vantage/11 benchmarks,as these will immediately show the stability of your GPU OC by either crashing/slowing down/texture corruption or any graphical anomalies.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>4) Repeat the above step till you GPU OC passes all the tests without any problem,after you start getting problem reduce the core clock in increments of 5 MHz and again run 2 loops of unigine and 3dmark benchmarks each,and keep decrementing till your card becomes stable and stops artifacting or giving any problem.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>5) Through the last step we have now successfully found out our stable and highest core clock ceiling.So now in a way we have isolated the core clock from memory clock as memory clock have been untouched till now.So now start incrementing memory clock in increments of 10 MHz(Please don&#8217;t be over adventurous with memory like with core clock,memory is the component which can be easily destroyed by the slightest of mistake).Now repeat the same benchmark runs and strategy followed for core clock in earlier steps and you would have found out your memory clock ceiling too.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>6) Congratulations! you have achieved a stable OC on your GPU without messing with voltages.Now to keep these settings click &#8220;Apply Overclocking At Startup&#8221; in afterburner,and save the OC settings in a profile represented in afterburner as numbers at the bottom.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>&#8212;&#8211;With Messing With The Voltages</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>1) Here we follow the above 6 steps word to word and follow up from there.Now that we have got stable OC without increasing voltages,and if we need even higher OC then we need to up the voltage in small increments.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>2) Now for this we need to make some changes in the options of afterburner,click options in afterburner and then under the generals tab check the &#8220;unlock voltage and enable voltage monitoring options&#8221;.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>3) After setting up afterburner increase the core clock by 10 MHz again and again benchmark it and see if it crashes,if it does increase the voltage in increments of 5 mV and then again benchmark and see if the card has stabilized or not.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>4) Repeat the procedure given above till either you reach your desired OC or you reach 1.1 V.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>5) Once you reach the max possible OC apart from running the benchmarks also run OCCT GPU test for at least 30 minutes and check the stability of the card,if it survives well you have achieved a successful Overclock,if it does not decrement the core clocks by 5 MHz and keep doing this till your GPU is stable.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>6) Final step enjoy gaming with increased performance .</li>
</ul>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-geforce-fermi-gpu-overclocking-guide/">Nvidia Geforce Fermi GPU Overclocking Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/nvidia-geforce-fermi-gpu-overclocking-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">65</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.ocfreaks.com @ 2026-03-09 23:31:23 by W3 Total Cache
-->