<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>intel - OCFreaks!</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/tag/intel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/tag/intel/</link>
	<description>Overclocking , Gaming , Technology , Robotics &#38; DIY!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.4</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">42777727</site>	<item>
		<title>GIGABYTE GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 Review</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gigabyte-ga-z97x-gaming-7-review/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gigabyte-ga-z97x-gaming-7-review/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arijit Guha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=2510</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Introduction Hi everyone, this time we&#8217;ll be reviewing the GIGABYTE GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 motherboard. The GIGABYTE GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 motherboard is made with the latest Intel Z97 chipset and targeted towards the mainstream to hardcore gamers as well as enthusiasts. It supports the latest Intel Haswell refresh series of CPUs and packs a lot of features. Here [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/gigabyte-ga-z97x-gaming-7-review/">GIGABYTE GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction--><br />
<img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/z97x-gaming-7/cover.jpg" /></p>
<p><span class="shead"> Introduction </span></p>
<p>Hi everyone, this time we&#8217;ll be reviewing the GIGABYTE GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 motherboard. The GIGABYTE GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 motherboard is made with the latest Intel Z97 chipset and targeted towards the mainstream to hardcore gamers as well as enthusiasts. It supports the latest Intel Haswell refresh series of CPUs and packs a lot of features.</p>
<p>Here is the link to the motherboard(GIGABYTE official site) : <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gigabyte.in/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4959#ov">GIGABYTE GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 motherboard</a>. This is a full sized ATX motherboard and features Killer E2200 LAN and Realtek ALC 1150 115 dB SNR audio for a complete gaming experience. Lets move on to the specs as shown on GIGABYTE website:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>CPU</td>
<td>Support for Intel® Core™ i7 processors/Intel® Core™ i5 processors/ Intel® Core™ i3 processors/Intel® Pentium® processors/ Intel® Celeron® processors in the LGA1150 package<br />
L3 cache varies with CPU<br />
(Please refer &#8220;CPU Support List&#8221; for more information.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chipset</td>
<td>Intel® Z97 Express Chipset</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Memory</td>
<td>4 x DDR3 DIMM sockets supporting up to 32 GB of system memory<br />
* Due to a Windows 32-bit operating system limitation, when more than 4 GB of physical memory is installed, the actual memory size displayed will be less than the size of the physical memory installed.<br />
Dual channel memory architecture<br />
Support for DDR3 3200(O.C.) / 3100(O.C.) / 3000(O.C.) / 2933(O.C.) / 2800(O.C.) / 2666(O.C.) / 2600(O.C.) / 2500(O.C.) / 2400(O.C.) / 2200(O.C.) / 2133(O.C.) / 2000(O.C.) / 1866(O.C.) / 1800(O.C.) / 1600 / 1333 MHz memory modules<br />
Support for non-ECC memory modules<br />
Support for Extreme Memory Profile (XMP) memory modules<br />
(Please refer &#8220;Memory Support List&#8221; for more information.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Onboard Graphics</td>
<td>Integrated Graphics Processor:<br />
1 x D-Sub port, supporting a maximum resolution of 1920&#215;1200@60Hz<br />
1 x DVI-D port, supporting a maximum resolution of 1920&#215;1200@60Hz<br />
* The DVI-D port does not support D-Sub connection by adapter.<br />
1 x HDMI port, supporting a maximum resolution of 4096&#215;2160@24Hz or 2560&#215;1600@60Hz<br />
* Support for HDMI 1.4a version.<br />
Support for up to 3 displays at the same time<br />
Maximum shared memory of 512MB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Audio</td>
<td>Realtek® ALC1150 codec<br />
Support for Sound Blaster X-Fi MB3<br />
High Definition Audio<br />
2/4/5.1/7.1-channel<br />
Support for S/PDIF Out</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LAN</td>
<td>Qualcomm® Atheros Killer E2201 LAN chip (10/100/1000 Mbit)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Expansion Slots</td>
<td>1 x PCI Express x16 slot, running at x16 (PCIEX16)<br />
* For optimum performance, if only one PCI Express graphics card is to be installed, be sure to install it in the PCIEX16 slot.</p>
<p>1 x PCI Express x16 slot, running at x8 (PCIEX8)<br />
* The PCIEX8 slot shares bandwidth with the PCIEX16 slot. When the PCIEX8 slot is populated, the PCIEX16 slot will operate at up to x8 mode.</p>
<p>1 x PCI Express x16 slot, running at x4 (PCIEX4)<br />
* The PCIEX4 slot shares bandwidth with the PCIEX8 and PCIEX16 slots. When the PCIEX4 slot is populated, the PCIEX16 slot will operate at up to x8 mode and the PCIEX8 will operate at up to x4 mode.<br />
* When installing a x8 or above card in the PCIEX4 slot, make sure to set PCIE Slot Configuration (CPU) in BIOS Setup to x4. (Refer to Chapter 2, &#8220;BIOS Setup,&#8221; &#8220;Peripherals,&#8221; for more information.)<br />
(The PCIEX16, PCIEX8 and PCIEX4 slots conform to PCI Express 3.0 standard.)</p>
<p>3 x PCI Express x1 slots<br />
(The PCI Express x1 slots conform to PCI Express 2.0 standard.)</p>
<p>1 x PCI slot</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Multi-Graphics Technology</td>
<td>Support for 3-Way/2-Way AMD CrossFire™and 2-Way NVIDIA® SLI™ Technology</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Storage Interface</td>
<td>Chipset:<br />
1 x M.2 PCIe connector<br />
(Socket 3, M key, type 2242/2260/2280 SATA &#038; PCIe SSD support)<br />
1 x SATA Express connector<br />
6 x SATA 6Gb/s connectors (SATA3 0~5)<br />
(M.2, SATA Express, and SATA3 4/5 connectors can only be used one at a time. The SATA3 4/5 connectors will become unavailable when an M.2 SSD is installed.)<br />
Support for RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, and RAID 10<br />
Marvell® 88SE9172 chip:<br />
2 x SATA 6Gb/s connectors (GSATA3 6~7)<br />
Support for RAID 0 and RAID 1<br />
* Due to system limitation, Intel RAID and Marvell RAID can only use either one.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>USB</td>
<td>Chipset:<br />
6 x USB 3.0/2.0 ports (4 ports on the back panel, 2 ports available through the internal USB header)<br />
8 x USB 2.0/1.1 ports (4 ports on the back panel, 4 ports available through the internal USB headers)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internal I/O Connectors</td>
<td>1 x 24-pin ATX main power connector<br />
1 x 8-pin ATX 12V power connector<br />
1 x PCIe power connector<br />
1 x M.2 PCIe connector<br />
1 x SATA Express connector<br />
8 x SATA 6Gb/s connectors<br />
1 x CPU fan header<br />
1 x water cooling fan header (CPU_OPT)<br />
4 x system fan headers<br />
1 x front panel header<br />
1 x front panel audio header<br />
1 x S/PDIF Out header<br />
1 x USB 3.0/2.0 header<br />
2 x USB 2.0/1.1 headers<br />
1 x serial port header<br />
1 x Clear CMOS jumper<br />
1 x Trusted Platform Module (TPM) header<br />
1 x power button<br />
1 x reset button<br />
1 x Clear CMOS button<br />
2 x BIOS switches<br />
Voltage measurement points</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Back Panel Connectors</td>
<td>1 x PS/2 mouse port<br />
1 x PS/2 Keyboard port<br />
1 x D-Sub port<br />
1 x DVI-D port<br />
1 x HDMI port<br />
4 x USB 3.0/2.0 ports<br />
4 x USB 2.0/1.1 ports<br />
1 x RJ-45 port<br />
1 x optical S/PDIF Out connector<br />
5 x audio jacks (Center/Subwoofer Speaker Out, Rear Speaker Out, Line In, Line Out, Mic In)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>I/O Controller</td>
<td>iTE® I/O Controller Chip</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>H/W Monitoring</td>
<td>System voltage detection<br />
CPU/Chipset/System temperature detection<br />
CPU/CPU OPT/System fan speed detection<br />
CPU/System overheating warning<br />
CPU/CPU OPT/System fan fail warning<br />
CPU/CPU OPT/System fan speed control<br />
* Whether the fan speed control function is supported will depend on the cooler you install.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BIOS</td>
<td>2 x 128 Mbit flash<br />
Use of licensed AMI UEFI BIOS<br />
Support for DualBIOS™<br />
PnP 1.0a, DMI 2.7, WfM 2.0, SM BIOS 2.7, ACPI 5.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Unique Features</td>
<td>Support for APP Center<br />
* Available applications in APP Center may differ by motherboard model. Supported functions of each application may also differ depending on motherboard specifications.<br />
@BIOS<br />
EasyTune<br />
EZ Setup<br />
Fast Boot<br />
Game Controller<br />
ON/OFF Charge<br />
Smart TimeLock<br />
Smart Recovery 2<br />
System Information Viewer<br />
USB Blocker<br />
Support for Q-Flash<br />
Support for Smart Switch<br />
Support for Xpress Install</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bundle Software</td>
<td>Norton® Internet Security (OEM version)<br />
Intel® Rapid Start Technology<br />
Intel® Smart Connect Technology<br />
Intel® Smart Response Technology</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Operating System</td>
<td>Support for Windows 8.1/8/7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Form Factor</td>
<td>ATX Form Factor; 30.5cm x 24.4cm</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/gigabyte-ga-z97x-gaming-7-review/">GIGABYTE GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/gigabyte-ga-z97x-gaming-7-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2510</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Z97-Deluxe Review part 1</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-z97-deluxe-review/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-z97-deluxe-review/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Previews & Unboxing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=2199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sumon checks out the top of the line Z97 motherboard from Asus</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-z97-deluxe-review/">Asus Z97-Deluxe Review part 1</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction--><br />
<span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Introduction</span></span><br />
Asus has a long-standing tradition of producing quality motherboards at a price.<br />
Today we will be taking a look at the Z97 Deluxe form its upcoming lineup of Z97 lineup.<br />
We will be looking at the Features and other information related to the motherboard only for now since most of the details of the chip-set and performance numbers are still under Intel&#8217;s NDA as of now.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/z97-deluxe/header.png" width="600" height="400" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> Lets check out what in the box, shall we?<br />
The motherboard comes in a black big box with a sleek design with special mention of the five way optimization that Asus brings to table with this generation.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/z97-deluxe/box_front.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/z97-deluxe/box_front.jpg" width="600" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>Other prominent features of the board such as the Wi-Fi GO!, Turbo App, Crystal Sound 2 and Turbo LAN are highlighted at the rear of the packaging.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/z97-deluxe/box_back.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/z97-deluxe/box_back.jpg" width="600" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>Looking inside the box we see a nice package including</p>
<ul>
<li>The Motherbaord</li>
<li>The user Guide</li>
<li>A brochure highlighting the main features</li>
<li>Sli Bridge</li>
<li>6x Sata Cables</li>
<li>Q-Connectors</li>
<li>I/O shield</li>
<li>1x Wi-Fi/Bluetooth antenna</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/z97-deluxe/package.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/rev/z97-deluxe/package.jpg" width="600" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-z97-deluxe-review/">Asus Z97-Deluxe Review part 1</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-z97-deluxe-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2199</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel&#8217;s Broadwell wont be coming in desktops</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/intels-broadwell-wont-be-coming-in-desktops/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/intels-broadwell-wont-be-coming-in-desktops/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=1586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; Recent reports from Fudzila indicates that Brodawell might not come for desktop since Intel finds Desktop upgrading cycle is slower as compared to mobile platforms. Instead they will release something codenamed Haswell refresh. Our sources are telling us that Intel will do desktop chip every two years, which is a huge slow down from [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/intels-broadwell-wont-be-coming-in-desktops/">Intel&#8217;s Broadwell wont be coming in desktops</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" alt="" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/misc/intel_logo.jpg" width="600" height="400" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Recent reports from <a href="http://fudzilla.com/home/item/32524-broadwell-won%E2%80%99t-make-it-to-desktop">Fudzila</a> indicates that Brodawell might not come for desktop since Intel finds Desktop upgrading cycle is slower as compared to mobile platforms. Instead they will release something codenamed <em><strong>Haswell refresh.</strong></em></p>
<blockquote><p>Our sources are telling us that Intel will do desktop chip every two years, which is a huge slow down from the current roadmap, making it much easier for AMD to grab some breathing space in the desktop segment.</p></blockquote>
<p>The next new architectural change in desktop will come in form of skylake in 2015.</p>
<p>Intel&#8217;s own survey indicates the average PC is now more than four years old, the PC market is mature and upgrade cycles are getting longer, which explains the shift to a two-year cycle in the desktop segment.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/intels-broadwell-wont-be-coming-in-desktops/">Intel&#8217;s Broadwell wont be coming in desktops</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/intels-broadwell-wont-be-coming-in-desktops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1586</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe Review</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-p8z77-v-deluxe-review/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-p8z77-v-deluxe-review/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumon Pathak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Asus just pulled one more ace from their sleeves and proved why they are No1! Today we take a look at ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe in detail.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-p8z77-v-deluxe-review/">ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:Introduction - P8Z77 V Deluxe--><br />
<span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"><strong>Introduction : P8Z77 V Deluxe </strong></span></span></p>
<p>The foremost thing that comes into mind when building a rig is the motherboard as that is the most important component of a smoothly running computer system. So basically Motherboard manufacture&#8217;s always fight out to bring the best in the market. Today we will review one top of the line motherboard from one of the dominating players in the components market : ASUS.</p>
<p>The motherboard we will be reviewing is P8Z77 V Deluxe. The topmost model on the Z77 mainstream lineup.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/z77_1.jpg" alt="" width="600px" /></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/z77_3.jpg" alt="" width="600px" /></p>
<div class="highlight"><strong>A few words on the Z77 Chipset :</strong><br />
The Z77 chipset is supposed to be the replacement of the Z68 chipset from Intel along with the 3rd generation ivy bridge processors.As such they are supposed to be better than the erstwhile Z68 platform;now whether they are better is a question of debate. Only difference I can see feature wise is the inclusion of USB3.0 and iRst 11.0 as well as the surprise removal of the PCI Slots in the Z77 platform.</p>
<div data-jsid="message">Here&#8217;s a block diagram of Z77 for the technically inquisitive.</div>
</div>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="https://www.ocfreaks.com/imgs/asus-z77-motherboard-review/Z77-blockdiagram.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div class="vspacer"></div>
<p><strong>Asus Z77 lineup</strong><br />
Asus currently has 9 motherboard in its Z77 lineup ranging from the low end to the high end of the price spectrum.The top of the line being P8Z77 V Deluxe which we are reviewing today.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-p8z77-v-deluxe-review/">ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/asus-p8z77-v-deluxe-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">211</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Leaked Benchmarks from Intel&#8217;s Ivy Bridge</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/intel-ivy-bridge-leaked-benchmark/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/intel-ivy-bridge-leaked-benchmark/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karan Raj Baruah ( Aka : thetechfreak )]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 05:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The i7 3770 showed minor improvements over the i7 2600 in limited benchmarks reviewed. For most, this was expected, as the major improvements were to come with the Intel HD Graphics 4000, 22nm 3-D Tri-Gate Transistor Technology, and improved TDP (77W). &#160; &#160; Recently, a leak from NordicHardware gave us a glimpse of the potential [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/intel-ivy-bridge-leaked-benchmark/">More Leaked Benchmarks from Intel&#8217;s Ivy Bridge</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The i7 3770 showed minor improvements over the i7 2600 in limited benchmarks reviewed. For most, this was expected, as the major improvements were to come with the Intel HD Graphics 4000, 22nm 3-D Tri-Gate Transistor Technology, and improved TDP (77W).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="http://media.bestofmicro.com/Intel-Ivy-Bridge-CPU-Benchmarks,R-Y-317230-13.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="290" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Recently, a leak from NordicHardware gave us a glimpse of the potential of the Ivy Bridge i7 3770K when overclocked using liquid nitrogen. The i7 3770K running at 6.961 GHz with memory at DDR3 2652 MHz with 7-11-7-28-1T timings &#8211; on liquid nitrogen &#8211; completed SuperPi 1M benchmark in 5.187 seconds.</p>
<p>The current record with a Core i7 2600K in SuperPi 1M benchmark is 6.109 seconds at 6.042 GHz, while a Core i7 980X has the world record at 5.781 seconds and 6.930 GHz. These unofficial results would give the i7 3770K a new world record, along with nearly a 1 GHz clock speed improvement over the i7 2600K on liquid nitrogen.</p>
<p>Also, NordicHardware talked about a new record in SuperPi 32M. The i7 3770K clocked at 6.650 GHz completed SuperPi 32M in 5 minutes and 2.843 seconds, which is faster than the current record of 5 minutes and 13.719 seconds. With the i7 3770K clocked at 6.805 GHz, it performed the PiFast test in just 10.56 seconds, which can be compared to the current record at 12.01 seconds.</p>
<p>These unofficial results give overclockers and enthusiasts alike something to look forward to down the road</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Ivy-Bridge-benchmarks-overclocked-i7-3770,15128.html">Source</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/intel-ivy-bridge-leaked-benchmark/">More Leaked Benchmarks from Intel&#8217;s Ivy Bridge</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/intel-ivy-bridge-leaked-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">179</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Develops Atom System-on-Chip with &#8220;Ivy Bridge&#8221; Graphics Core.</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/intel-develops-atom-system-on-chip-with-ivy-bridge-graphics-core/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/intel-develops-atom-system-on-chip-with-ivy-bridge-graphics-core/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karan Raj Baruah ( Aka : thetechfreak )]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 12:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Intel Corp. is working on a new Atom system-on-chip that will feature graphics core inherited from code-named &#8220;Ivy Bridge&#8221; microprocessor and thus supporting DirectX 11 capabilities. The new chips are already listed in Intel&#8217;s drivers and will likely be released in foreseeable future. Intel Atom &#8220;ValleyView&#8221; (VLV) processor will have two current-generation Atom cores, will [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/intel-develops-atom-system-on-chip-with-ivy-bridge-graphics-core/">Intel Develops Atom System-on-Chip with &#8220;Ivy Bridge&#8221; Graphics Core.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel Corp. is working on a new Atom system-on-chip that will feature graphics core inherited from code-named &#8220;Ivy Bridge&#8221; microprocessor and thus supporting DirectX 11 capabilities. The new chips are already listed in Intel&#8217;s drivers and will likely be released in foreseeable future.</p>
<p>Intel Atom &#8220;ValleyView&#8221; (VLV) processor will have two current-generation Atom cores, will have integrated memory controller &#8220;Pondicherry&#8221; memory arbiter as well as Intel generation 7 graphics core (Ivy Bridge) found inside Core i-series &#8220;Ivy Bridge&#8221; chip, according to findings made by <a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&amp;px=MTA3NDc" target="_blank">Phoronix</a> web-site. The chip will support output to two DisplayPort monitors as well as to one HDMI panel in addition to other outputs.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" src="http://i.imgur.com/8I9lE.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="371" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The chip will be made using 32nm fabrication process, which may mean that it will be releases in 2012 and as it is essentially an upgraded CedarView processor with improved memory sub-system, much more powerful graphics core with DirectX 11 and OpenCL support and other improvements. Some sources isniste that the chip is to be made at 22nm node and will be available in 2013. The new Atom SoC is projected to be paired with code-named Balboa Park chipset, which suggests that the VLV is the heart of Intel&#8217;s future-generation low-power/low-cost platform. Intel has confirmed existence of Valleyview chip in plans.</p>
<p>&#8220;ValleyView is a CedarView-like chip but with an Ivy Bridge graphics core,&#8221; Jesse Barnes of Intel&#8217;s open-source technology center is reported to have said.</p>
<p>Intel has already started adding support for next-generation microprocessors, including Valleyview and Haswell into its drivers for Linux operating system. Adding support to drivers does not reflect availability of hardware shortly, but rather represents major features of future products</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20120321191847_Intel_Develops_Atom_System_on_Chip_with_Ivy_Bridge_Graphics_Core.html">Source</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/intel-develops-atom-system-on-chip-with-ivy-bridge-graphics-core/">Intel Develops Atom System-on-Chip with &#8220;Ivy Bridge&#8221; Graphics Core.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/intel-develops-atom-system-on-chip-with-ivy-bridge-graphics-core/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">176</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legacy Intel LGA 775 / AMD AMx CPU Overclocking Guide</title>
		<link>https://www.ocfreaks.com/legacy-intel-lga-775-amd-am2-overclocking-guide/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ocfreaks.com/legacy-intel-lga-775-amd-am2-overclocking-guide/?noamp=mobile#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umang Gajera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides & Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocfreaks.com/?p=67</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Before I start the core just keep in mind &#8211; what the acronyms below mean(Just in case you are a complete noob like me ): &#8211; OCing = OverClocking &#8211; Northbridge = NB = MCH &#8211; Mobo = Motherboard &#8211; Proccy = Processor Legacy Intel LGA 775 Overclocking Basically Front Side Bus (FSB) is set [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/legacy-intel-lga-775-amd-am2-overclocking-guide/">Legacy Intel LGA 775 / AMD AMx CPU Overclocking Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I start the core just keep in mind &#8211; what the acronyms below mean(Just in case you are a complete noob like me ):</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite">
<ul>
<li>&#8211; OCing = OverClocking</li>
<li>&#8211; Northbridge = NB = MCH</li>
<li>&#8211; Mobo = Motherboard</li>
<li>&#8211; Proccy = Processor</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin">Legacy Intel LGA 775 Overclocking</span></span></p>
<p>Basically Front Side Bus (FSB) is set of wires i.e. a Bus that connects CPU to the “Northbridge(Chipset)”.By the way &#8211; Intel also calls the Northbridge as “Memory Controller Hub” or MCH for short.</p>
<p>Wait … what is the Northbridge in the first place?</p>
<div class="note">Hmm… If CPU is the brain of our computer then the Northbrigde(Chipset) is the Heart of your computer. The Northbridge is the bigger chip of the 2 in the chipset &#8211; the other being the southbridge. The Northbridge is the gateway/door for the CPU to access and control all the components inside the PC. If the Northbridge fails then the bridge between the CPU and other computer components breaks which renders the CPU a complete etched-silicon crap!</div>
<p>Now back to where I was …</p>
<p>This FSB is the address and data bus which the CPU uses. The CPU interacts with all the other components of the computer through the FSB via the Northbridge. Since the Northbridge is so central to all the connections in the computer &#8211; increasing the FSB will also increase the speed at which other components interact with the Northbridge which in turn will increase the system performance. Overclocking the FSB may be a little tricky for someone new because the base clock rate differs from the effective(actual) clock rate which is termed as ‘Quad-Pumping’ by Intel.</p>
<p>On systems that support Intel processors the FSB is Quad Pumped which can be stated as :</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>Quad Pumped FSB (QFSB) = 4 x Base FSB</strong></div>
<p>Hence for eg. a system running at 1333 MHz FSB has a base FSB frequency of 333 MHz.</p>
<p>One of the key factors that makes FSB the first choice to be overclocked is that the CPU’s speed is determined by the Base FSB which is then multiplied by the CPU Multiplier which sets the operating frequency of the CPU.This relation of proportionality between the CPU and FSB frequency gives an instant CPU speed boost when the FSB is increased given that the multiplier remains the same.</p>
<p>The formula is given as :</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>CPU Speed = Base FSB x CPU Multiplier</strong></div>
<p>The CPU multiplier is also referred to as CPU to FSB ratio in some BIOSes &#8211; its logical because if you divide CPU frequency with FSB freq what we get is the CPU Multiplier.</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>CPU Multiplier = CPU Speed : Base FSB</strong></div>
<p>Lets take an example of Q9300 which has native FSB of 1333 MHz (Quad Pumped) and Multiplier ‘Top-Locked’ to 7.5</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite">Now Base FSB = 333 MHz hence ,<br />
CPU speed = 333 x 7.5 = 2.5 GHz which is the stock speed for Q9300</div>
<p><strong>Native Processor FSB</strong> is the default FSB which is used to generate the CPU frequency. Each processor has its own predefined default FSB. When every thing is set to default &#8211; i.e. no Overclocking &#8211; the CPU dictates the Northbrigde that it wants to work at the default CPU FSB.</p>
<p>When is comes to FSB we are mainly concerned with max FSB supported by the motherboard and the native FSB of the processor. The Q9xx0 series Quads from Intel may have the edge of being 45nm based and slightly faster than the 65nm based Q6×00 series Quads. But the 45nm Quads have higher native FSB of 1333 MHz which makes it difficult to overclock beyond a limit and it even gets worse for quads like Q9300 which has the multiplier at 7.5 max. Consider today’s p35 , x38 , p45 , x48 chipset based motherboards which can be OCed to 1600MHz easily but not quite beyond 2000 MHz i.e. a Base FSB of 500 MHz is limit for the current generation chipsets. Now with Q9300 the ‘max possible (can be pushed more)’ overclock will be = 500 x 7.5 = 3.75 GHz which does not make it suitable for Overclocking because such a high FSB will tax both the chipset and also the RAM to maintain good FSB : DRAM ratios [ill explain RAM OCing in next Article].</p>
<p>On the other hand lets consider Q6600 which has 1066MHz with multiplier of 9 max. With Q6600 the ‘max possible’ OC will be = 500 x 9 = 4.5 GHz which some have reached. I remember that the Tom’s Hardware team from France managed to push Q6600 up to 5 GHz on liquid nitrogen. Due to this relation between the Base FSB and the CPU Multiplier the CPU having native FSB less then the max FSB supported by the motherboard has a more Overclocking head room than a CPU have native FSB same as the max FSB of the motherboard.</p>
<p>In our consideration of Q9300 and Q6600 I would go with Q6600 because its more Overclockable and will not tax the chipset with extreme high FSB as with Q9300. But on the other side the main advantage of Q9300 is the higher FSB itself. Since the native FSB of the processor dictates the default FSB at which the system will run having higher default FSB will make system run fast due to higher FSB. But the down fall is that further OC is possible from the default FSB , hence more the head room more is the Overclockability.</p>
<p><span class="shead"><span class="sheadin"> AMD With HTT </span></span></p>
<p>On AMD systems the bus used to interface the CPU with Northbridge uses HyperTransport Technology (HTT) which was earlier called Lighting Data Transport (LDT). This is similar to FSB on Intel systems which uses Assisted/Advanced Gunning Transreceiver Logic (AGTL+). On AMD systems the bus speed is the base HT speed from which we get the HT Link speed.</p>
<p>Here’s the formula :</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>HT Link freq = Base HT x HT(LDT) Multiplier</strong></div>
<p>Usually the HT multiplier swing is limited between 1 and 5(max).<br />
So if we have bus speed of 200 MHz and HT multiplier set to 5x then our HT link speed will be : <strong>200 x 5 = 1000 MHz </strong>HT Link</p>
<p>The HT link speed is used to get actual data rate of the system bus. Since HTT can transfer data twice per clock pulse (Double Data Rate) the effective can be calculated as :</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>HT Link x 2 (DDR) = Effective Bus Data Rate</strong></div>
<p>In our case we have: <strong>1000 MHz x 2 = 2000 MHz</strong> Effective Bus Data Rate</p>
<p>As on Intel systems the CPU speed here is also obtained by multiplying the CPU Multiplier with the bus speed (Base HT) which is as follows :</p>
<div class="highlight_rcb_lite"><strong>CPU speed = Base HT x CPU Multiplier</strong></div>
<p>Lets say we have an AMD X2 5000+ which has its multiplier set to 13 . Hence in our case the CPU would be : <strong>200 x 13 = 2600 MHz = 2.6 GHz</strong></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com/legacy-intel-lga-775-amd-am2-overclocking-guide/">Legacy Intel LGA 775 / AMD AMx CPU Overclocking Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ocfreaks.com">OCFreaks!</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ocfreaks.com/legacy-intel-lga-775-amd-am2-overclocking-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">67</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.ocfreaks.com @ 2026-03-05 20:00:07 by W3 Total Cache
-->